The authors concluded that in their analysis of real-world data, the effectiveness of the biosimilar was equivalent to that of the reference product in patients with Crohn disease (CD) who were naïve to therapy with infliximab, and no difference was observed in terms of safety between the 2 therapies.
Celltrion’s CT-P13, an infliximab biosimilar approved in the United States as Inflectra and in the European Union as Remsima, is widely used in the treatment of inflammatory diseases, and was approved on the basis of studies conducted in rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis.
An extrapolated indication was granted for the treatment of Crohn disease (CD), and since approval, numerous real-world data have supported the use of CT-P13 in patients with CD. A new study, published this week in Annals of Internal Medicine, further underscores the safety and effectiveness of CT-P13 in this disease state.
The comparative equivalence cohort study compared CT-P13 with the reference infliximab, Remicade, in patients with CD who were naïve to infliximab therapy. In total, 5050 patients aged 15 years or older were enrolled in the study, and 2551 were given the reference infliximab, while 2499 were given the biosimilar. None of the patients had other diseases with an indication for treatment with infliximab.
The study’s primary outcome was a composite end point of death, CD-related surgery, all-cause hospitalization, and reimbursement for another biologic treatment. The predefined equivalence margin (0.80-1.25) was defined as a 95% CI of the hazard ratio (HR) of CT-P13 versus the reference product in a multivariable marginal Cox model.
In total, 1147 patients in the reference group met the composite end point, with 838 hospitalizations. In the biosimilar group, 952 patients, with 719 hospitalizations, met the end point. In a multivariable analysis, CT-P13 was equivalent to the reference infliximab, with an HR of 1.10 (95% CI, 0.26-3.34).
There were no differences in safety outcomes between the 2 groups with respect to serious infection (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.61-1.11), tuberculosis (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.36-3.34), or malignancy (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.33-1.32).
The authors concluded that in their analysis of the real-world data, the effectiveness of the biosimilar was equivalent to that of the reference product in patients with CD who were naïve to therapy with infliximab, and no difference was observed in terms of safety between the 2 therapies.
Reference
Meyer A, Rudant J, Drouin J, Weill A, Carbonnel F, Coste J. Effectiveness and safety of reference infliximab and biosimilar in Crohn disease: a French equivalence study [published online December 11, 2018]. Ann Intern Med. doi: 10.7326/M18-1512.
From Amjevita to Zarxio: A Decade of US Biosimilar Approvals
March 6th 2025Since the FDA’s groundbreaking approval of Zarxio in 2015, the US biosimilars market has surged to 67 approvals across 18 originators—though the journey has been anything but smooth, with adoption facing hurdles along the way.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Resolution of Injection Site Reactions After Switching to Adalimumab Biosimilar
February 22nd 2025A 15-year-old girl with ulcerative colitis who developed injection site reactions to the adalimumab reference product was successfully switched to the biosimilar LBAL without recurrence of symptoms, demonstrating the safety and effectiveness of switching for medical reasons, likely due to an allergic reaction to an excipient in the originator.