The International Coalition of Medicines Regulatory Authorities, an executive-level coalition of regulators from 29 medicines regulatory authorities from territories including Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, the European Union, and the United States, among others, recently released a statement of confidence in biosimilars.
The International Coalition of Medicines Regulatory Authorities (ICMRA), an executive-level coalition of regulators from 29 medicines regulatory authorities from territories including Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, the European Union, and the United States, among others, recently released a statement of confidence in biosimilars.
In the statement aimed at educating healthcare professionals, ICMRA said that it aims to provide assurance for stakeholders on the robust regulatory process for approval and monitoring of biosimilars and to highlight the benefits that biosimilars can provide for both patients and healthcare systems at large.
Biosimilars are medicines with proven quality, manufactured to the same quality standards as other biologics, and are only approved after rigorous scientific evaluation.
They explain that biosimilars must demonstrate high similarity to their reference products and that the foundation for providing this evidence of similarity comprises the extensive comparability studies that are undertaken using state-of-the-art analytical techniques that allow for robust comparison of the products’ molecules. Full clinical programs are not necessary except to help address remaining questions that may require human data (such as pharmacokinetics) to evaluate.
ICMRA highlights the fact that biosimilars have been used safely for many years, and no relevant differences in adverse effects have been observed between biosimilars and their references.
While regulatory pathways differ across countries, and while substitution at the pharmacy level is an issue regulated by nations individually, global regulators have confidence in the rigor of the approval process for biosimilars, and many regulators—and providers—accept switching to biosimilars as part of clinical practice.
However, ICMRA notes, copy biologics—sometimes called biomimics or biocopies—that are not approved on the basis of a robust biosimilar regulatory pathway must not be considered biosimilars; these noncomparable products have not been assessed in extensive comparability studies, so their quality is not assured.
BioRationality: EMA Accepts Waiver of Clinical Efficacy Testing of Biosimilars
April 21st 2025Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, shares his latest citizen's petition to the FDA, calling on the agency to waive clinical efficacy testing in response to the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) efforts towards the same goal.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
How State Substitution Laws Shape Insulin Biosimilar Adoption
April 15th 2025States with fewer restrictions on biosimilar substitution tend to see higher uptake of interchangeable insulin glargine, showing how even small policy details can significantly influence biosimilar adoption and expand access to more affordable insulin.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
Review Calls for Path to Global Harmonization of Biosimilar Development Regulations
March 17th 2025Global biosimilar regulatory harmonization will be needed to reduce development costs and improve patient access, despite challenges posed by differing national requirements and regulatory frameworks, according to review authors.