The House Committee on Oversight and Reform has launched a wide-ranging investigation into prescription drug pricing in the United States.
Yesterday, the House Committee on Oversight and Reform launched a wide-ranging investigation into prescription drug pricing in the United States.
The committee’s chair, Representative Elijah Cummings, D-Maryland, sent letters to 12 drug makers seeking information and documents related to pricing practices. According to the committee’s statement, the letters seek further information about price increases, investments in research and development, and corporate strategies to defend market share. The committee will next hold a series of hearings on drug pricing.
“The Committee on Oversight and Reform is investigating the actions of drug companies in raising prescription drug prices in the United States, as well as the effects of these actions on federal and state budgets and on American families,” Cummings wrote in a statement announcing the investigation. “For years, drug companies have been aggressively increasing prices on existing drugs and setting higher launch prices for new drugs while recording windfall profits. The goals of this investigation are to determine why drug companies are increasing prices so dramatically, how drug companies are using the proceeds, and what steps can be taken to reduce prescription drug prices.”
Among the products that are subject to the investigation are AbbVie’s brand-name adalimumab, Humira; Amgen’s etanercept, Enbrel; and Sanofi’s insulin glargine, Lantus. All 3 of these products are the targets of as-yet unrealized biosimilar and follow-on competition:
Additional products that are subject to the committee’s investigation are cancer drugs imatinib (Novartis’ Gleevec) and lenalidomide (Celgene’s Revlimid), pain drug pregabalin (Pfizer’s Lyrica), and glatiramer acetate (Teva’s Copaxone), among others.
Boosting Health Care Sustainability: The Role of Biosimilars in Latin America
November 21st 2024Biosimilars could improve access to biologic treatments and health care sustainability in Latin America, but their adoption is hindered by misconceptions, regulatory gaps, and weak pharmacovigilance, requiring targeted education and stronger regulations.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Eye on Pharma: EU Aflibercept Approvals; Biosimilars Canada Campaign; Celltrion Data
November 19th 2024The European Commission grants marketing authorization to 2 aflibercept biosimilars; Biosimilars Canada launches new campaign to provide sustainable solutions to employers; Celltrion shares positive data for 2 biosimilars.
Can Global Policies to Boost Biosimilar Adoption Work in the US?
November 17th 2024On this special episode of Not So Different honoring Global Biosimilars Week, Craig Burton, executive director of the Biosimilars Council, explores how global policies—from incentives to health equity strategies—could boost biosimilar adoption in the US.
Breaking Down Biosimilar Barriers: Interchangeability
November 14th 2024Part 3 of this series for Global Biosimilars Week, penned by Dracey Poore, director of biosimilars at Cardinal Health, explores the critical topic of interchangeability, examining its role in shaping biosimilar adoption and the broader implications for accessibility.