The House Committee on Oversight and Reform has launched a wide-ranging investigation into prescription drug pricing in the United States.
Yesterday, the House Committee on Oversight and Reform launched a wide-ranging investigation into prescription drug pricing in the United States.
The committee’s chair, Representative Elijah Cummings, D-Maryland, sent letters to 12 drug makers seeking information and documents related to pricing practices. According to the committee’s statement, the letters seek further information about price increases, investments in research and development, and corporate strategies to defend market share. The committee will next hold a series of hearings on drug pricing.
“The Committee on Oversight and Reform is investigating the actions of drug companies in raising prescription drug prices in the United States, as well as the effects of these actions on federal and state budgets and on American families,” Cummings wrote in a statement announcing the investigation. “For years, drug companies have been aggressively increasing prices on existing drugs and setting higher launch prices for new drugs while recording windfall profits. The goals of this investigation are to determine why drug companies are increasing prices so dramatically, how drug companies are using the proceeds, and what steps can be taken to reduce prescription drug prices.”
Among the products that are subject to the investigation are AbbVie’s brand-name adalimumab, Humira; Amgen’s etanercept, Enbrel; and Sanofi’s insulin glargine, Lantus. All 3 of these products are the targets of as-yet unrealized biosimilar and follow-on competition:
Additional products that are subject to the committee’s investigation are cancer drugs imatinib (Novartis’ Gleevec) and lenalidomide (Celgene’s Revlimid), pain drug pregabalin (Pfizer’s Lyrica), and glatiramer acetate (Teva’s Copaxone), among others.
13 Strategies to Avoid the Nocebo Effect During Biosimilar Switching
December 18th 2024A systematic review identified 13 strategies, including patient and provider education, empathetic communication, and shared decision-making, to mitigate the nocebo effect in biosimilar switching, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach to improve patient perceptions and therapeutic outcomes.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
BioRationality: Withdrawal of Proposed Terminal Disclaimer Rule Spells Major Setback for Biosimilars
December 10th 2024The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)’s withdrawal of its proposed terminal disclaimer rule is seen as a setback for biosimilar developers, as it preserves patent prosecution practices that favor originator companies and increases costs for biosimilar competition, according to Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD.
Commercial Payer Coverage of Biosimilars: Market Share, Pricing, and Policy Shifts
December 4th 2024Researchers observe significant shifts in payer preferences for originator vs biosimilar products from 2017 to 2022, revealing growing payer interest in multiple product options, alongside the increasing market share of biosimilars, which contributed to notable reductions in both average sales prices and wholesale acquisition costs.
Perceptions of Biosimilar Switching Among Veterans With IBD
December 2nd 2024Veterans with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) prioritize shared decision-making, transparency, and individualized care in biosimilar switching, favoring delayed switching for severe cases and greater patient control.