Brazil benefits from a program, known as the Partnership for Productive Development, that brings together government and the private sector to develop strategic products of interest to the Brazilian health system—including biosimilars of high-cost biologics that account for approximately half of annual drug spending.
In 2010, Brazil’s National Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA) established criteria for biosimilar approval, forming a comprehensive pathway for these products for the first time. The guidelines, Collegiate Board Resolution 55/2010, provides 2 ways in which a biosimilar can be approved: comparability and individual development.
The comparability demonstration is similar to that described by the World Health Organization. Under Brazil’s comparability pathway, biosimilars require comparative data from preclinical as well as phase 1 and phase 3 clinical studies in relation to the reference product, and the extrapolation of indications is permitted. Robust pharmacovigilance systems, similar to those in place for the reference drug, are required.
Read more about biosimilars in Brazil.
However, the individual development pathway differs significantly from the comparability pathway; individual development requires comparative data only from preclinical trials and phase 3 confirmatory studies, with no requirement to produce comparative data from phase 1 studies. Extrapolation of indications for products developed in this manner are not permitted, and these products may not be treated as interchangeable with their references.
For both types of biosimilar products, explains a newly published paper, Brazil benefits from a program known as the Partnership for Productive Development (PPD), which brings together government and the private sector to develop strategic products of interest to the Brazilian health system—including biosimilars of the high-cost biologics that account for approximately half of annual drug spending.
In an arrangement that the paper calls a “win-win opportunity” for both government and private companies, under a PPD agreement, the master cell bank for a biologic is required by law to be transferred to the government organization participating in the agreement for use in manufacturing, and the biosimilar maker develops a product that will then be purchased directly by the Brazilian Ministry of Health. Thus, the government establishes a supply of a cost-reducing product, and the biosimilar developer ensures robust sales of its product. Biosimilars that are currently part of such agreements include rituximab, adalimumab, and bevacizumab.
The impact of such agreements on Brazil’s healthcare system has the potential to be significant. At the same time, nationalizing production of biosimilars presents an opportunity, say the paper's authors, for the nation to positive impact its trade balance, generate tax revenue, and provide jobs in Brazil.
Reference
Scheinberg MA, Felix PAO, Kos IA, Andrade MA, Azevedo VF. Partnership for productive development of biosimilar products: perspective of access to biological products in the Brazilian market. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2018;16(3): eRW4175. doi: 10.1590/S1679-45082018RW4175.
Eye on Pharma: Sandoz Files Antitrust Suit; Yuflyma Interchangeability; Costco’s Ustekinumab Pick
April 22nd 2025Sandoz's antitrust suit against Amgen, the FDA’s interchangeability designation for Celltrion’s adalimumab biosimilar, and the inclusion of an ustekinumab biosimilar in Costco’s prescription program highlight growing momentum to expand biosimilar access and affordability for patients with chronic inflammatory diseases.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
President Trump Signs Executive Order to Bring Down Drug Prices
April 16th 2025To help bring down sky-high drug prices, President Donald Trump signed an executive order pushing for faster biosimilar development, more transparency, and tougher rules on pharmacy benefit managers—aiming to save billions and make meds more affordable for everyone.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Latest Biosimilar Deals Signal Growth Across Immunology, Oncology Markets
April 14th 2025During Q1 2025, pharmaceutical companies accelerated biosimilar expansion through strategic acquisitions and partnerships in hopes of boosting patient access to lower-cost treatments in immunology and oncology.
Experts Pressure Congress to Remove Roadblocks for Biosimilars
April 12th 2025Lawmakers and expert witnesses emphasized the potential of biosimilars to lower health care costs by overcoming barriers like pharmacy benefit manager practices, limited awareness, and regulatory delays to improve access and competition in chronic disease management during a recent congressional hearing.