A retrospective, postmarketing study demonstrates higher incidence of joint and bone pain, neutropenia with certain filgrastim biosimilars, compared with Neupogen.
Editor's Note: Since publication of this article, the findings in the study by Rastogi S et al referenced below have been criticized as having been based on poor scientific methodology. Reliance upon data from the VigiBase adverse event database of the World Health Organisation, which is not intended for the testing of medical hypotheses, is one of the criticisms leveled against this study. The Center for Biosimilars® is preparing a follow-up article on this issue.
A new study has associated a higher incidence of certain adverse events with the filgrastim biosimilars, Zarzio, Grasin, Nivestim, and Tevagrastim compared with the reference product Neupogen.
These biosimilar products are marketed outside the United States under these brands and have US equivalents.
Filgrastim was originally approved in 1991 for the treatment of patients with cancer who are receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. It was subsequently approved for multiple oncology related indications and severe chronic neutropenia. Multiple filgrastim biosimilars have been approved in the United States, Europe, and elsewhere since 2008.
The retrospective, postmarketing study comprised data from 1991 to May 2018 from VigiBase, a World Health Organization database of adverse events information. VigiBase is often used to aid postmarket studies.
Distribution of Adverse Events
Investigators identified 11,183 adverse drug reaction reports, of which 51.5% (5764) were related to Neupogen, the originator. Leucostim had 680; Zarzio, 622; Grasin, 545; Nivestim, 359; and Tevagrastim, 152.
Grasin was associated with higher reporting of pyrexia, or fever, compared with neupogen (11.5% vs 7.9%, reporting odds ratio [ROR] 1.52); myalgia, or muscle pain, (37% vs 2.2%, ROR 25.94); and back pain (11.3% vs 4%, ROR 3.09).
Findings showed that Zarzio was associated with increased reporting of arthralgia, also known as joint pain (4.5% vs 2.9%, ROR 1.59). Zarzio also had higher reporting of neutropenia, or low white blood cell count (11.4% vs 4%, ROR 2.59).
Bone pain was reported more often for Nivestim than reference filgrastim (14.4% vs 8.3%, ROR 1.87).
Drug ineffectiveness was reported in cases with Zarzio (35.9%), Nivestim (19.4%), and Tevagrastim (42.2%).
Efficacy Differences Also Observed
The authors also observed significant differences between the originator and biosimilars in regard to efficacy, adverse events reported, and time to onset of occurrences.
They stressed that epidemiologic studies are needed to confirm these findings and provide additional insights.
Zarzio is owned by Sandoz and is marketed is as Zarxio in the United States. Grasin is owned by Teva Pharmaceuticals Japan and is marketed in Republic of Korea. Tevagrastim is marketed in Europe and is owned by Teva Generics GmbH, a Teva Pharmaceuticals company. Tevagrastim is marketed as Tbo-filgrastim in the United States. Nivestim is owned by Pfizer and is marketed as Nivestym in the United States.
Leucostim is marketed in Peru, the Republic of Korea, and Turkey.
In the United States, the FDA recently launched the FDA adverse Event Reporting system (FAERS). FAERS is a public search engine for drugs and biologics and contains adverse event reports submitted by healthcare providers, consumers, manufacturers of drugs and biologics, and other stakeholders.
13 Strategies to Avoid the Nocebo Effect During Biosimilar Switching
December 18th 2024A systematic review identified 13 strategies, including patient and provider education, empathetic communication, and shared decision-making, to mitigate the nocebo effect in biosimilar switching, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach to improve patient perceptions and therapeutic outcomes.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Review Confirms Clinical Safety of Sandoz Denosumab Biosimilar vs Originator
December 11th 2024Sandoz's biosimilar denosumab (Jubbonti/Wyost) has demonstrated analytical, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and clinical equivalence to reference denosumab (Prolia/Xgeva), supporting its approval and extrapolation to all approved indications.
Biosimilars Oncology Roundup for June 2024—Podcast Edition
July 7th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review biosimilar news coming out of June, with clinical trial results from conferences and a study showcasing how to overcome economic and noneconomic barriers to oncology biosimilars.
Pertuzumab Biosimilar Shows Promise in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Treatment
December 9th 2024The proposed pertuzumab biosimilar QL1209 demonstrated equivalent efficacy and safety to reference pertuzumab (Perjeta) in neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive, ER/PR-negative early or locally advanced breast cancer, offering a cost-effective alternative with comparable clinical outcomes.
Switching to Rituximab Biosimilars Is Safe, Effective for Patients With Oncohematological Diseases
December 5th 2024Patients with oncohematological diseases switching to rituximab biosimilars experienced similar safety and efficacy, highlighting biosimilars' potential for cost-effective treatment across various medical conditions.