The industry group representing generic and biosimilar manufacturers has issued a new report that claims that Ireland’s policies are keeping the nation from benefitting from €25 million (approximately $29 million) in annual savings to its national health system.
While the European experience with biosimilars is often hailed as a model that the United States could benefit from following, some EU member states continue to grapple with policy barriers that limit biosimilar uptake. Medicines for Ireland, an industry group representing generic and biosimilar manufacturers, has issued a new report that claims that Ireland’s policies are keeping the nation from benefitting from €25 million (approximately $29 million) in annual savings to its national health system.
The report claims that as of January 2018, biosimilars had an approximate 2% market share for biologic therapies in Ireland, despite the fact that, as of the report’s date, 38 biosimilar products are approved for use in the European Union. Among the products with the lowest market share are biosimilar etanercept, with 1% of the market, and biosimilar insulin glargine, with just 0.2% of the market.
According to Medicines for Ireland, the Irish government must enact key policy measures if the uptake of biosimilars is to improve. In addition to such familiar suggestions as undertaking an awareness campaign to educate patients and providers about biosimilar therapies, the report calls for financial incentives to encourage biosimilar prescribing, particularly at the hospital level: gainsharing would allow hospitals to undertake switches to biosimilar drugs and retain a portion of the savings achieved, and quotas, which would set targets for biosimilar prescribing, would be beneficial in “creating a culture of cost consideration.”
Additionally, Medicines for Ireland suggests doing away with Ireland’s current mandatory price reductions for branded products when competitors enter the marketplace; currently, under a national agreement with the Irish Pharmaceutical Healthcare Association, when a generic or biosimilar drug is launched, the innovator product’s price must be discounted by 30%. Eliminating this mandated price drop could spur greater competition among new market entrants, the report states.
Finally, the report took aim at the national government, which has not yet delivered its promised National Biosimilar Policy. In August 2017, the nation’s Minister for Health published a consultation paper, with an open comment period, on the development of a new approach to biosimilars.
The paper put forth a variety of policy options, including prescribing biosimilars to new patients, switching stable patients to biosimilars, undertaking educational programs, implementing tendering programs, setting reference pricing guidelines, and limiting drug companies’ interactions with educational institutions or physicians. Medicines for Ireland’s report calls on the government to enact the new national policy in a timely way to allow for a more coherent approach to these therapies.
“With affordability now a key concern in respect of ensuring Irish patients have access to the medicines they need when they need them most,” said Owen McKeon, chairperson of Medicines for Ireland in an accompanying statement, “the Department of Health, Government, and wider medical community cannot afford to continue to ignore opportunities for further savings.”
13 Strategies to Avoid the Nocebo Effect During Biosimilar Switching
December 18th 2024A systematic review identified 13 strategies, including patient and provider education, empathetic communication, and shared decision-making, to mitigate the nocebo effect in biosimilar switching, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach to improve patient perceptions and therapeutic outcomes.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Eye on Pharma: Golimumab Biosimilar Update; Korea Approves Denosumab; Xbrane, Intas Collaboration
December 10th 2024Alvotech and Advanz Pharma have submitted a European marketing application for their golimumab biosimilar to treat inflammatory diseases, while Celltrion secured Korean approval for denosumab biosimilars, and Intas Pharmaceuticals partnered with Xbrane Biopharma on a nivolumab biosimilar.
Perceptions of Biosimilar Switching Among Veterans With IBD
December 2nd 2024Veterans with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) prioritize shared decision-making, transparency, and individualized care in biosimilar switching, favoring delayed switching for severe cases and greater patient control.
The Rebate War: How Originator Companies Are Fighting Back Against Biosimilars
November 25th 2024Few biologics in the US have multiple biosimilar competitors, but originator biologics respond quickly to competition by increasing rebates and lowering net prices, despite short approval-to-launch timelines for biosimilars.