The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guidelines may help get biosimilars into circulation because the NCCN will recommend them for off-label uses.
The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) can be very helpful for biosimilar uptake because its guidelines allow for more breadth of use than FDA-approved indications, according to a panel of experts who spoke recently.
Payers view the NCCN Guidelines as a gold standard for making reimbursement decisions. Thus, if biosimilars are listed in the guidelines, especially for indications that are off label, it could influence physician prescribing practices and lead to an uptake in biosimilar use, said Bhavesh Shah, RPh, BCOP, senior director of specialty and hematology/oncology pharmacy at Boston Medical Center Health System (BMCHS) of Massachusetts.
Tim Peterson, PharmD, BCOP, clinical pharmacy specialist at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, New York, said biologics have been “a significant game changer” over previous, conventional chemotherapy agents. “But we’re now seeing this shift in the paradigm to biosimilars becoming available in different settings, and we’ll start to see more how those are adopted in clinical practice,” he said.
If the NCCN feels “comfortable giving these biosimilar agents in what is an off-label indication, that means that they’ve largely accepted likely the same scenarios that the FDA would require for a manufacturer for extrapolation of indications,” Peterson said.
For example, the filgrastim biosimilar Granix was approved in 2012 as a generic for the originator filgrastim (Neupogen), prior to the biologics approval pathway for protein-based agents under the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act. Granix was FDA approved for severe neutropenia—just 1 of the 5 indications for the originator product. “It actually doesn’t have all the indications that the other [filgrastim] biosimilars do, but that’s another option that we have,” Peterson said.
A recent study found that 55% of Granix claims for employer plans were for off-label usage.
“When we’re looking at when physicians are actually going to incorporate these agents… I think [NCCN Guidelines are] going to specifically drive how these are incorporated into practice,” he added.
Also, the discrepancy between how many biosimilars that are FDA approved versus on the market has caused confusion for many physicians, nurses, and pharmacists.
“It may not be available for a certain period of time, and we didn’t always know that. That caused some confusion as well about how many products we have, what we can use, and when,” noted Marc Earl, Pharm D, BCOP, director of pharmacy at Cleveland Clinic of Ohio.
One reason many approved biosimilars take a long time to come to market is that many get held up in patent litigation with originator manufacturers.
“Now that we’re starting to open up into the oncology world, a lot of these drugs, these antibody therapies, are starting to come off patent. This area is really going to explode,” said Peterson.
Peterson expects patent litigation for biosimilar denosumab, a RANK ligand inhibitor used for osteoporosis or skeletal-related events in prostate and breast cancer or multiple myeloma, as it was originally approved for a different indication. “I envision that one taking quite a while to become commercially available.”
The panel was moderated by Anthony Mato, MD, MSCE, director of the Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Program at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
13 Strategies to Avoid the Nocebo Effect During Biosimilar Switching
December 18th 2024A systematic review identified 13 strategies, including patient and provider education, empathetic communication, and shared decision-making, to mitigate the nocebo effect in biosimilar switching, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach to improve patient perceptions and therapeutic outcomes.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Review Confirms Clinical Safety of Sandoz Denosumab Biosimilar vs Originator
December 11th 2024Sandoz's biosimilar denosumab (Jubbonti/Wyost) has demonstrated analytical, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and clinical equivalence to reference denosumab (Prolia/Xgeva), supporting its approval and extrapolation to all approved indications.
Biosimilars Oncology Roundup for June 2024—Podcast Edition
July 7th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review biosimilar news coming out of June, with clinical trial results from conferences and a study showcasing how to overcome economic and noneconomic barriers to oncology biosimilars.
Pertuzumab Biosimilar Shows Promise in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Treatment
December 9th 2024The proposed pertuzumab biosimilar QL1209 demonstrated equivalent efficacy and safety to reference pertuzumab (Perjeta) in neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive, ER/PR-negative early or locally advanced breast cancer, offering a cost-effective alternative with comparable clinical outcomes.
Switching to Rituximab Biosimilars Is Safe, Effective for Patients With Oncohematological Diseases
December 5th 2024Patients with oncohematological diseases switching to rituximab biosimilars experienced similar safety and efficacy, highlighting biosimilars' potential for cost-effective treatment across various medical conditions.