While biosimilars have made significant inroads into the European marketplace, there remain hurdles to the adoption of these lower-cost drugs, especially in lower-income nations; external reference pricing can mean that drugs are priced to wealthier European countries’ financial capabilities, and manufacturers’ launch strategies may bring biosimilars to nations with the greatest market potential first.
While biosimilars have made significant inroads into the European marketplace, there remain hurdles to the adoption of these lower-cost drugs, especially in lower-income nations; external reference pricing can mean that drugs are priced to wealthier European countries’ financial capabilities, and manufacturers’ launch strategies may bring biosimilars to nations with the greatest market potential first.
A paper newly published in Biomed Research International describes factors that limit the increased use of biosimilars in 10 nations where financial constraints are greater than they are elsewhere in Europe.
In 2015, using a survey that collected feedback from 2 policy experts (1 from a public agency and 1 from a private entity) each in Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Russia, and Slovakia, researchers sought to understand the policy environment in each country to the eventual uptake of trastuzumab, rituximab, and infliximab biosimilars.
Across the countries, a number of key barriers to patient access to biologic therapy were identified, including:
The respondents said that the key benefit of biosimilars would be increased access to treatment; cost savings and the increased number of treatment options were mentioned only as secondary benefits.
The participants identified the following issues as limiting patient access to biosimilars:
While the authors note that the generalizability of their findings are limited by the small number of policy experts engaged in each country’s survey, they write that their findings indicate a need for more affordable biologic therapies in these less wealthy nations.
“Policy makers have to take a strategic approach to increase societal benefit from biosimilar medicines,” conclude the authors. “Relying on free-market incentives may not be strong enough; hence, active government interventions instead of ‘passive disinvestment’ policies are needed to correct for current access limitations.”
Reference
Inotai A, Csandi M, Petrova G, et al. Patient access, unmet medical need, expected benefits, and concerns related to the utilisation of biosimilars in Eastern European countries: a survey of experts [published online January 10, 2018]. Biomed Res Int. doi: 10.1155/2018/9597362.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under A Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
CHMP Pushes 3 Biosimilars Forward, Spelling Hope for Ophthalmology, Supportive Care Markets
February 6th 2025The European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) recommended 3 biosimilars and new indications for reference biologics, moving them closer to final European approval and expanding patient access.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
BioRationality: No More Biosimilars—Just Biogenerics
February 3rd 2025Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, argues that regulatory agencies should eliminate redundant clinical efficacy testing for biosimilars, recognizing them as "biogenerics" since physicochemical and in vitro biological comparisons are sufficient to ensure safety and efficacy.
FTC Releases Second Report on PBMs Meddling in Generic Drug Markets
January 19th 2025The 3 largest pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) increased many specialty generic drugs prices by hundreds of percent, with some drugs seeing thousands of percent markups, according to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC)’s second interim report on PBM practices.