Cetuximab (Erbitux), an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) monoclonal antibody used in the treatment of head and neck and colorectal cancer, so far faces no biosimilar challengers. However, Chinese researchers are reporting positive preclinical results for a proposed biosimilar, APZ001.
Cetuximab (Erbitux), an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) monoclonal antibody used in the treatment of head and neck and colorectal cancer, so far faces no biosimilar challengers. However, Chinese researchers are reporting positive preclinical results for a proposed biosimilar, APZ001.
Previous studies have demonstrated that APZ001 has the same therapeutic effects as the reference product in a mouse model, and a pharmacokinetic (PK) assessment in Cynomolgus monkeys showed that the 2 products have similar PK, toxicology, and immunogenicity.
Click to read more about cetuximab.
In the current study's observation of mouse behavior, both the reference and biosimilar showed negative effects in terms of nervous excitability, autonomic and nonautonomic nervous function, nervous-muscle function, and coordination function. There was no significant difference in negative behavior between mice given the 2 drugs, however.
In an evaluation of the 2 drugs in Cynomolgus monkeys, no significant differences were recorded in heart function, though monkeys given APZ001 showed insignificant differences in heart rate and blood pressure from those given the reference, under anesthesia. No differences were observed between breath parameters or electrocardiogram results.
There were also no significant differences observed in drug-related urinary volume alteration between monkeys administered the 2 drugs. During periods of drug administration and recovery in rabbits, no abnormal reactions were observed in animals receiving either product.
In human tissues, both APZ001 and the reference showed positive signals in endocardium, alveolar epithelial cells, and surrounding vessels, and showed negative results in kidney and liver tissues.
The investigators concluded that, in their safety assessment and bioequivalence study of the 2 products, APZ001 and the reference showed highly similar effects in the animal models, and no severe adverse events were observed in any of the tested animals. APZ001, they conclude, may be a viable biosimilar for cetuximab.
Reference
Wang X, Guo J, Deng X, et al. Comparative safety assessments of the biosimilar APZ001 and Erbitux in pre-clinical animal models. Acta Cir Bras. 2018;33(8): 690-702. doi: 10.1590/s0102-865020180080000005.
Boosting Health Care Sustainability: The Role of Biosimilars in Latin America
November 21st 2024Biosimilars could improve access to biologic treatments and health care sustainability in Latin America, but their adoption is hindered by misconceptions, regulatory gaps, and weak pharmacovigilance, requiring targeted education and stronger regulations.
Biosimilars Development Roundup for October 2024—Podcast Edition
November 3rd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the GRx+Biosims conference, which included discussions on data transparency, artificial intelligence (AI), and collaboration to enhance the global supply chain for biosimilars and generic drugs, as well as the evolving requirements for biosimilar devices.
Biosimilars Oncology Roundup for June 2024—Podcast Edition
July 7th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review biosimilar news coming out of June, with clinical trial results from conferences and a study showcasing how to overcome economic and noneconomic barriers to oncology biosimilars.
Eye on Pharma: Henlius, Organon Updates; Meitheal Portfolio Expansion; Celltrion Zymfentra Data
November 5th 2024Henlius and Organon’s pertuzumab biosimilar met phase 3 goals; Meitheal expanded its US biosimilars; Celltrion’s subcutaneous infliximab (Zymfentra) showed monotherapy could be as effective as combination therapy for inflammatory bowel disease.
BioRationality: Should mRNA Copies Be Filed as NDAs or Biosimilars?
November 4th 2024The article by Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, argues that the FDA’s classification of future copies of messenger RNA (mRNA) products could be reconsidered, suggesting they might be eligible for new drug applications (NDAs) or a hybrid biosimilar category due to their unique characteristics and increasing prevalence.