Sandoz announced today that it has enrolled its first patient in a combined phase 1 and phase 3 study of its proposed denosumab biosimilar versus EU-authorized Prolia.
Sandoz announced today that it has enrolled its first patient in a combined phase 1 and phase 3 study of its proposed denosumab biosimilar versus EU-authorized Prolia.
Denosumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits the RANKL protein and thereby decreases the production of osteoclasts, is indicated for a number of conditions, including osteoporosis in postmenopausal women, increased fracture risk in men, a treatment-induced bone loss, among others.
“People with the bone disease osteoporosis are more likely to fracture or break a bone, causing pain and restriction of mobility, which can be extremely debilitating,” said Florian Bieber, global head of development at Sandoz, in a statement announcing the trial. “As we progress our development program for proposed biosimilar denosumab, we believe it gives patients hope for early and expanded access to advanced biologic medicines, which may change the course of their disease.”
The study, ROSALIA, is a multicenter, randomized, parallel-arm, double-blind study with a total duration of up to 82 weeks. The drug maker plans to enroll approximately 522 postmenopausal patients with osteoporosis for 2 treatment periods.
In the first period of 52 weeks, patients will be randomized to receive 2 doses of either GP2411 or the EU-authorized reference product.
In the second treatment period, from week 52 to week 78, patients who received the reference denosumab in the first period will be rerandomized either to continue to receive the reference or to switch to GP2411. All patients in the biosimilar group will continue with a third dose of GP2411.
The study’s primary end points include percentage change in lumbar spine bone mineral density, and the drug maker expects to complete the study by June 2022.
The reference drug, Prolia, has been a strong seller for Amgen, the innovator behind denosumab. In first quarter 2019 financial results, Amgen said that the drug had brought in $390 million in the United States and $202 million in the rest of the world. Those sales were up 20% year over year, said the company, driven by higher unit demand.
Other biosimilar developers targeting denosumab include Australian drug maker NeuClone; the company announced in early 2018 that it had entered early-stage development of a proposed biosimilar.
Biosimilars Fuel Price Cuts in European Insulin Glargine Markets
February 14th 2025Although Lantus continues to lead the insulin glargine market globally, the rise of biosimilars like Abasaglar and Semglee has sparked significant price reductions, with some European countries seeing discounts of up to 42.3%.
Biosimilars Development Roundup for October 2024—Podcast Edition
November 3rd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the GRx+Biosims conference, which included discussions on data transparency, artificial intelligence (AI), and collaboration to enhance the global supply chain for biosimilars and generic drugs, as well as the evolving requirements for biosimilar devices.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
The Banking of Biosimilars: Insights From a Leading Health Economist
February 4th 2025Biosimilars have the potential to reduce health care costs and expand patient access, but economic and policy barriers affect adoption, explored James D. Chambers, PhD, MPharm, MSc, associate professor at the Tufts Medical Center Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, in an interview.
BioRationality: No More Biosimilars—Just Biogenerics
February 3rd 2025Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, argues that regulatory agencies should eliminate redundant clinical efficacy testing for biosimilars, recognizing them as "biogenerics" since physicochemical and in vitro biological comparisons are sufficient to ensure safety and efficacy.