This week, drug maker Sanofi filed a patent infringement suit against Mylan in a New Jersey district court. Sanofi’s suit alleges that Mylan has infringed on 18 patents for its originator insulin glargine, Lantus.
This week, drug maker Sanofi filed a patent infringement suit against Mylan in a New Jersey district court. Sanofi’s suit alleges that Mylan has infringed on 18 patents for its originator insulin glargine, Lantus.
The suit was triggered by Mylan’s filing of a New Drug Application (NDA) with the FDA for a pre-filled pen and a drug vial presentation of a follow-on insulin glargine (in the United States, insulins are regulated as drugs and not as biologics; hence, drug makers must submit NDAs rather than biologics license applications for follow-ons of originator products). According to Sanofi, the Mylan NDA included a challenge to all of Sanofi’s patents listed for Lantus in the FDA’s orange book.
Mylan’s filing of an NDA for its proposed insulin glargine follows the recent release of data demonstrating comparable efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity with Lantus, as well as the follow-on’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic equivalence with the reference drug. Mylan, working together with India-based partner Biocon, is also seeking European approval for its product; in September, Biocon received a certificate of compliance from the European Union for its manufacturing facility in Malaysia where it plans to produce the insulin. Approval of the facility was welcome news for Biocon; high operational costs related to the Malaysian facility had been partially responsible for a 51% drop in Biocon’s second-quarter net profits, despite the company’s strong sales of insulins.
Sanofi faces challenges from other drug developers who seek a share of the Lantus market; in July, the FDA granted Merck’s follow-on insulin glargine a tentative approval, but will not provide the drug with a final approval until patent litigation, brought by Sanofi, has concluded. Sanofi’s suit triggered an automatic stay of 30 months.
Already on the US market is Boehringer Ingelheim’s (BI) Basaglar, the first FDA-approved insulin glargine follow-on, which launched in 2016 after a lengthy patent litigation with Sanofi. Competition from Basaglar led to steep declines in insulin market share for Sanofi in the second quarter of 2017; Sanofi’s US sales of Lantus and Toujeo (a second insulin glargine) dropped by 23.9%. CEO Oliver Brandicourt has alerted investors that the company’s fortunes were unlikely to change in the remainder of 2017, and warned that the company could see accelerated declines in sales of its insulins as it faced further competition.
Boosting Health Care Sustainability: The Role of Biosimilars in Latin America
November 21st 2024Biosimilars could improve access to biologic treatments and health care sustainability in Latin America, but their adoption is hindered by misconceptions, regulatory gaps, and weak pharmacovigilance, requiring targeted education and stronger regulations.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Breaking Down Biosimilar Barriers: Interchangeability
November 14th 2024Part 3 of this series for Global Biosimilars Week, penned by Dracey Poore, director of biosimilars at Cardinal Health, explores the critical topic of interchangeability, examining its role in shaping biosimilar adoption and the broader implications for accessibility.
Breaking Down Biosimilar Barriers: Payer and PBM Policies
November 13th 2024Part 2 of this series for Global Biosimilars Week dives into the complexities of payer and pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) policies, how they impact biosimilar accessibility, and how addressing these issues may look under a second Trump term.