“The common initiation in North America of infliximab as monotherapy is concerning, given the now substantial body of evidence…documenting the importance of concomitant [immunomodulators] in reducing the likelihood of secondary loss of responsiveness related to anti-infliximab antibodies," write the researchers.
The use of anti—tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) drugs, which are highly effective in treating pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), varies in different global territories. A recent initiative of the international Pediatric IBD Network (PIBDNet) explored regional differences in anti-TNF use in pediatric IBD in order to help understand regional differences and how those differences may impact a patient’s outcomes.
PIBDNet developed an electronic survey that was sent to all members who are physicians treating pediatric IBD, and responses were gathered from 344 providers in 43 countries (54% in North America, 29% in Europe, 6% in Oceania, 6% in Asia, 3% in Africa, and 2% in South America). The respondents each treated a median of 40 patients with IBD.
The survey explored practice patterns, including the percentage of patients who were given anti-TNF therapy, the percentage of the time that anti-TNF agents were used as the first line of therapy, how often a patient was given infliximab versus adalimumab, choice of immunomodulator, and other issues.
The researchers found that North American physicians used anti-TNF agents as first-line therapy 80% of the time in treating Crohn disease (CD), versus 38% of the time in Europe and 30% of the time in other territories. North Americans also used infliximab (though not adalimumab) in combination with an immunomodulator less often in both patients naïve to immunomodulation and in those who had failed prior treatment.
While physicians worldwide used similar adalimumab induction regimens and similar treatment intensification protocols, North Americans were also less likely (42%) than other physicians (90% in Europe and 100% elsewhere) to adhere strictly to standard infliximab induction protocols.
In treating ulcerative colitis (UC), anti-TNF drug use was also higher in North America, with a median of 20% of patients receiving anti-TNF agents in North America versus 10% in Europe and 5% elsewhere. Infliximab was the most used first anti-TNF agent in all areas. As in CD, physicians treating UC used the drug more frequently as a first-line therapy (76% of the time) than did physicians in Europe (47%) or elsewhere (36%).
Interestingly, more routine testing, such as testing for tuberculosis, before starting anti-TNF therapy was undertaken in Europe (95% of cases) versus North America (90% of cases) or elsewhere (83%). However, after starting therapy, more annual screening was performed in North America (39% of cases) than Europe (14% of cases) or elsewhere (16% of cases).
The researchers concluded that the use of anti-TNFs varies significantly in North America from the rest of the world.
“Our North American pediatric data are very different from adult surveys of the American Gastroenterological Association in 2009 and of gastroenterologists in Maryland and Washington, DC, in 2007, where 70% and 48% of respondents, respectively, said they would use [immunomodulators] prior to prescribing [infliximab],” wrote the authors.
They add that “The common initiation in North America of infliximab as monotherapy is concerning, given the now substantial body of evidence…documenting the importance of concomitant [immunomodulators] in reducing the likelihood of secondary loss of responsiveness related to anti-infliximab antibodies.”
Reference
Church PC, Hyams J, Ruemmele F, de Ridder L, Turner D, Griffiths AM. The continental divide: anti-TNF use in pediatric IBD is different in North America compared to other parts of the world. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;2018:3190548. doi: 10.1155/2018/3190548.
The Growing Impact of Biosimilars in IBD Care
April 23rd 2025Biosimilars are proving to be a game-changing solution in the fight against inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), offering a cost-effective alternative to biologics with similar efficacy and safety, while innovative drug delivery systems promise to further enhance treatment outcomes and accessibility for millions worldwide.
Biosimilars Gastroenterology Roundup for November 2024—Podcast Edition
December 1st 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss market changes in the adalimumab space; calls for PBM transparency and biosimilar access reforms grew; new data for biosimilars in gastroenterology conditions; and all the takeaways from this year's Global Biosimilars Week.
Biosimilar and Biologic Use Increasing in Greek Patients With IBD
April 19th 2025A retrospective study from a single inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) center in Greece reported that from 2018 to 2022, the use of biologics increased by 28% yearly, and the proportion of patients using biosimilars grew from 33% to 67%.
Biosimilars Gastroenterology Roundup for May 2024—Podcast Edition
June 2nd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review the biggest gastroenterology biosimilar stories from May 2024, covering new data from conferences and journals on infliximab and adalimumab products that demonstrate positive clinical results and confirm the safety of these biosimilars, as well as the feasibility of switching to them.
Early Success of Adalimumab Biosimilars Featured at AMCP 2025
April 5th 2025High adherence rates, comparable clinical effectiveness, and cost savings have marked the early adoption of adalimumab biosimilars in the US, particularly in formulary-driven transitions, as shown in 2 retrospective studies presented at the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy annual meeting (AMCP 2025).
Biosimilars Gastroenterology Roundup: March 2025
April 1st 2025As the biosimilar industry celebrates a decade of growth, the market continues to evolve with expanded treatment options, cost savings, and a flurry of new competitors—yet regulatory challenges, market dynamics, and patient accessibility remain key hurdles to unlocking its full potential.