Rituximab was originally approved in the United States in 1997 for treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and has multiple additional approvals for orphan and nonorphan indications. But a recent study found off-label uses now account for more than half of patients receiving rituximab.
Rituximab, a monoclonal antibody to the B lymphocyte surface receptor CD20, was originally approved in the United States in 1997 for treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and has multiple additional approvals for orphan and nonorphan indications. But a recent study found off-label uses, particularly to treat demyelinating neurologic diseases, now account for more than half of patients receiving rituximab.
The study, conducted at Kaiser Permanente Colorado, included 1674 patients who received their first rituximab infusion between 2009 and 2017. Overall during that period, 1111 patients (66.4%) received rituximab for an approved indication and 563 (33.6%) received the drug for an off-label indication. However, off-label uses grew more common as the study went on, particularly in the latter half of the study period. By 2017, off-label indications were more common than approved indications; off-label use of rituximab rose from 1.2% of patients in 2009 to 55.6% by the end of the study in 2017. In contrast, use for approved orphan indications dropped from 92.8% of patients in 2009 to 38.8% in 2017.
Oncology indications comprised roughly three-fourths of the approved indications, most of which were non-Hodgkin lymphoma (66.4%), followed by autoimmune diseases, including both orphan-approved and orphan-designated indications, which accounted for 14.7%. The only approved nonorphan indication, rheumatoid arthritis, accounted for 11.3% of approved indications. Most off-label indications were neurologic diseases (72.7%), the vast majority of which were demyelinating diseases (91.4%), followed by hematologic diseases (7.3%).
Demyelinating Neurologic Conditions Driving Off-Label Use
The authors commented that the treatment of demyelinating neurologic conditions was “the primary driver of off-label use in our study,” and cited a recent Swedish study that found rituximab to be the disease-modifying therapy most commonly prescribed for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Furthermore, they noted that rituximab prescriptions in MS have risen following the publication of several small studies suggesting rituximab reduced inflammatory brain lesions in patients with MS.
New Biosimilars Enter a Huge and Growing Market
According to the authors, “Rituximab is considered a blockbuster specialty drug with nearly $4.2 billion in U.S. sales in 2017.” There are 2 FDA-approved rituximab biosimilars, Celltrion’s Truxima, which was approved in 2018, and Pfizer’s Ruxience, which was approved in 2019.
In light of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, an orphan indication, making up two-thirds of approved indications, the authors noted the expense of orphan drugs, writing “In 2017, the average cost per patient per year for an orphan drug was $147,308, compared with $30,708 for a nonorphan specialty drug.” They added that biosimilars could reduce these costs and stressed the importance of their findings for health plan policy makers, writing “the launch of lower-cost rituximab biosimilars could lead to further increased use of the biosimilars for label and off-label indications.”
Reference
Delate T, Hansen ML, Gutierrez AC, Le KN. Indications for Rituximab Use in an Integrated Health Care Delivery System. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020;26(7):832-838. doi:10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.7.832
BioRationality: Commemorating the 15th Anniversary of the BPCIA
April 8th 2025Affirming that analytical characterization is often sufficient for biosimilar approval, minimizing unnecessary clinical testing, and enhancing FDA-led education to counter stakeholder misconceptions are key recommendations put forth in this opinion piece by Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Early Success of Adalimumab Biosimilars Featured at AMCP 2025
April 5th 2025High adherence rates, comparable clinical effectiveness, and cost savings have marked the early adoption of adalimumab biosimilars in the US, particularly in formulary-driven transitions, as shown in 2 retrospective studies presented at the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy annual meeting (AMCP 2025).
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Biosimilars Gastroenterology Roundup: March 2025
April 1st 2025As the biosimilar industry celebrates a decade of growth, the market continues to evolve with expanded treatment options, cost savings, and a flurry of new competitors—yet regulatory challenges, market dynamics, and patient accessibility remain key hurdles to unlocking its full potential.