The Trump administration has withdrawn its proposal to block rebates and discounts given by drug makers to pharmacy benefit managers, Part D plans, and Medicaid managed care organizations.
The Trump administration has withdrawn its proposal to block rebates and discounts given by drug makers to pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), Part D plans, and Medicaid managed care organizations.
The rule would have excluded rebates from safe harbor protections that currently shelter drug makers’ rebates from penalties under the federal Anti-Kickback Statute and would have formed new safe harbor protections for discounts offered directly to patients, as well as fixed-fee service arrangements between drug makers and PBMs.
HHS previously said that the rule would counteract incentives behind higher list prices; currently, when a list price rises, patients who pay a percentage or all of the list price for a drug see their out-of-pocket expenses increase while PBMs reap financial rewards.
According to a report by Politico, the administration has now decided to withdraw the proposed rule, first put forward in February 2019 and championed by HHS Secretary Alex Azar, who has called the use of rebates in the United States “an absolutely silly system.” The rule reportedly faced dissent from domestic policy chief Joe Grogan and others who believed that it would be too costly to implement.
It had been expected that the rule would shake up the marketplace for biosimilars; while just 7 biosimilars have entered the US market, they have seen low levels of uptake. In at least 1 of those cases, rebates have been blamed for sluggish adoption. In 2017, Pfizer, maker of a biosimilar infliximab product (Inflectra), filed suit against Johnson & Johnson (J&J), maker of the reference infliximab (Remicade), for using the so-called “rebate trap” to block biosimilar competition for its high-selling product.
According to Pfizer’s suit, J&J threatened to withhold rebates (which often grow larger as performance metrics such as market share or volume rise, or which may be bundled together with rebates for other products) from insurers unless they agreed to exclude biosimilars from their formularies.
The now-withdrawn rule could have undercut the incentive for PBMs to favor drugs with higher rebates over drugs, like biosimilars, that have lower costs, and proponents say that it could have allowed for increased biosimilar uptake if drug makers made the decision to compete on price.
Senators Introduce Bipartisan Legislation to Protect Skinny Labeling
January 2nd 2025To close out the year, 4 senators came together to introduce a new bipartisan bill to protect biosimilar and generic drug manufacturers from patent litigation when obtaining “skinny label” approvals for their products.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
How Vertical Integration Drives Innovation and Access in Biosimilars
December 27th 2024Elie Bahou, PharmD, highlights how vertical integration in the biosimilar industry streamlines costs, improves supply reliability, accelerates market adoption, and enhances patient access, while emphasizing the value of collaboration, quality control, and value-based contracts for sustainable health care delivery.
13 Strategies to Avoid the Nocebo Effect During Biosimilar Switching
December 18th 2024A systematic review identified 13 strategies, including patient and provider education, empathetic communication, and shared decision-making, to mitigate the nocebo effect in biosimilar switching, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach to improve patient perceptions and therapeutic outcomes.
BioRationality: Withdrawal of Proposed Terminal Disclaimer Rule Spells Major Setback for Biosimilars
December 10th 2024The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)’s withdrawal of its proposed terminal disclaimer rule is seen as a setback for biosimilar developers, as it preserves patent prosecution practices that favor originator companies and increases costs for biosimilar competition, according to Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD.