The Salt Lake Tribune is reporting that public employees in the state of Utah could be paid by their insurance plan to fill prescriptions for high-cost drugs in Mexico instead of in their local pharmacies.
The Salt Lake Tribune is reporting that public employees in the state of Utah could be paid by their insurance plan to fill prescriptions for high-cost drugs in Mexico instead of in their local pharmacies.
PEHP Health and Benefits, a division of Utah Retirement Systems, is a nonprofit trust that provides health benefits to Utah’s public employees, including county, city, school, and other public workers.
According to PEHP’s members’ website, the Pharmacy Tourism Program allows members who are not enrolled in Medicare the option to fill select drugs in Tijuana, Mexico, rather than in their local pharmacies. For members with certain plan types, medications are covered by the payer’s pharmacy benefit at no extra cost, and members are allowed to fill a 90-day supply.
The payer also arranges and pays for roundtrip airfare from Utah to San Diego, California, as well as car transportation across the US—Mexico border to a facility in Tijuana that will dispense the drugs. Finally, patients who take the option to travel to Mexico are also paid a cash reward of $500.
Among the drugs that qualify for the tourism program plan are biologics etanercept (Enbrel), adalimumab (Humira), abatacept (Orencia), and ustekinumab (Stelara). Notably, potentially cost-saving biosimilars for etanercept and adalimumab have been approved by the FDA, but none of the biosimilar options have launched because of patent protection for the originator products.
Other drugs that qualify for the plan are products that treat multiple sclerosis (including glatiramer acetate, dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, interferon, and teriflunomide) as well as therapies to treat psoriasis (apremilast), osteoporosis (teriparatide) and cancer (abiraterone).
According to the Tribune, state representative Norman Thurston, a Republican representing Provo, said of the plan, “Why wouldn’t we pay $300 to go to San Diego, drive across to Mexico and save the system tens of thousands of dollars? If it can be done safely, we should be all over that.”
13 Strategies to Avoid the Nocebo Effect During Biosimilar Switching
December 18th 2024A systematic review identified 13 strategies, including patient and provider education, empathetic communication, and shared decision-making, to mitigate the nocebo effect in biosimilar switching, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach to improve patient perceptions and therapeutic outcomes.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Eye on Pharma: Golimumab Biosimilar Update; Korea Approves Denosumab; Xbrane, Intas Collaboration
December 10th 2024Alvotech and Advanz Pharma have submitted a European marketing application for their golimumab biosimilar to treat inflammatory diseases, while Celltrion secured Korean approval for denosumab biosimilars, and Intas Pharmaceuticals partnered with Xbrane Biopharma on a nivolumab biosimilar.
Perceptions of Biosimilar Switching Among Veterans With IBD
December 2nd 2024Veterans with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) prioritize shared decision-making, transparency, and individualized care in biosimilar switching, favoring delayed switching for severe cases and greater patient control.
The Rebate War: How Originator Companies Are Fighting Back Against Biosimilars
November 25th 2024Few biologics in the US have multiple biosimilar competitors, but originator biologics respond quickly to competition by increasing rebates and lowering net prices, despite short approval-to-launch timelines for biosimilars.