A recent white paper recaps the many barriers to biosimilar adoption in the United States and proposes a few ways that plans could change their reimbursement policies to help boost uptake.
A recent white paper recaps the many barriers to biosimilar adoption in the United States and proposes a few ways that plans could change their reimbursement policies to help boost uptake.
The paper, by Millman, said that fixed reimbursement, a system in which providers would be reimbursed the same amount no matter which product was administered (reference product or biosimilar) would create an incentive to prescribe the lowest-price product.
Differential reimbursement, meanwhile, would allow a larger markup on biosimilars so that providers would be safeguarded from a loss in profits. Commercial payers would pay more in markup, but since they have a lower average sales price, it would be less expensive to pay for biosimilars with a higher markup than an originator product with a lower markup. This would lead to higher biosimilar reimbursement for commercial payers but overall savings if providers had a financial incentive to prescribe biosimilars.
Federal policy changes could also increase the use of biosimilars, the paper said. Specifically, it cited the following:
The paper also cited the FDA’s Biosimilar Action Plan, including the 4 key strategies to induce competition in the US market. They include increasing efficiency around the development and approval process; expanding the Purple Book in order to increase clarity and support around biosimilar development, as well as the Biosimilar Product Development program to speed up and promote development; an education initiative; and reducing attempts to delay approval by originator manufacturers of reference products.
The report notes that some of the most “meaningful solutions are largely beyond the authority of the FDA.”
In fact, this week HHS issued a proposed rule that could help the market for biosimilars. The rule is intended to reduce patients’ out-of-pocket costs for prescription drugs by blocking rebates and discounts given to pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), Part D plans, and Medicaid managed care organizations and encourage discounts to go straight to patients.
The rule would exclude rebates from safe harbor protections that currently shelter drug makers’ rebates from penalties under the federal anti-kickback statute, and would create new safe harbor for discounts offered to patients, as well as fixed-fee service arrangements between drug makers and PBMs.
Breaking Down Biosimilar Barriers: Payer and PBM Policies
November 13th 2024Part 2 of this series for Global Biosimilars Week dives into the complexities of payer and pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) policies, how they impact biosimilar accessibility, and how addressing these issues may look under a second Trump term.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Skyrizi Overtakes Humira: “Product Hopping” Leaves Biosimilar Market in Limbo
November 7th 2024For the first time, Skyrizi (risankizumab-rzaa) has replaced Humira (reference adalimumab) as AbbVie’s sales driver, largely due to companies encouraging “product hopping” to avoid competition, creating concerns for the sustainability of the burgeoning adalimumab biosimilar market.
Eye on Pharma: Henlius, Organon Updates; Meitheal Portfolio Expansion; Celltrion Zymfentra Data
November 5th 2024Henlius and Organon’s pertuzumab biosimilar met phase 3 goals; Meitheal expanded its US biosimilars; Celltrion’s subcutaneous infliximab (Zymfentra) showed monotherapy could be as effective as combination therapy for inflammatory bowel disease.