The World Health Organization (WHO) announced that it will launch a pilot project later in 2017 for prequalifying biosimilars of cancer medications. The organization noted that it was a step towards making some of the most expensive biotherapeutic cancer treatments more accessible to low- and middle-income countries.
The Prequalification of Medicines Programme (PQP) is a service provided by WHO to assess the quality, safety, and efficacy of medicinal products. Prequalification ensures that medicines supplied by international procurement agencies meet acceptable standards of quality, safety, and efficacy, and gives the procurement agencies working to distribute drugs in resource-limited countries the choice of a wide range of quality medicines for bulk purchase. If the drugs meet international standards, they are listed on the WHO website as eligible for procurement, giving purchasing agencies a range of quality-assured medicines, vaccines, and diagnostics from which to choose. Many low-income countries use WHO’s list of prequalified products to guide their selection of medicines, vaccines, and technologies for national procurement, according to WHO, and it may also contribute to an increase in competition and further reduce the price of medicines.
In September 2017, WHO will invite manufacturers to submit applications for prequalification of biosimilar versions of 2 products on the WHO Essential Medicines List: rituximab (Genentech’s Rituxan, used principally to treat Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia) and trastuzumab (Roche’s Herceptin, used to treat breast cancer and stomach cancers). WHO is also studying options to prequalify insulin.
Once PQP invites manufacturers, they are asked to provide a comprehensive set of data about the quality, safety, and efficacy of the product being evaluated, including purity, stability, and clinical trial data. A team of assessors, including WHO staff and experts from global regulatory authorities, evaluates the presented data. Inspectors verify that manufacturing sites comply with WHO good manufacturing practices and verify that at any contract research organization that conducted trials related to the product also comply with WHO good clinical and laboratory practices. The PQP process can take from 3 months onward depending upon the quality of the data and completeness of the manufacturer’s records.
“Innovator biotherapeutic products are often too expensive for many countries, so biosimilars are a good opportunity to expand access and support countries to regulate and use these medicines,” noted Marie-Paule Kieny, MD, WHO assistant director general for health systems and innovation. If WHO finds that the biosimilars submitted for prequalification are comparable to the originator products in terms of quality, safety, and efficacy, the organization will list those medicines, which will become eligible for procurement by United Nations agencies.
Suzanne Hill, B. Med (Hons), Grad Dip Epi, PhD, FAFPHM, WHO’s director of essential medicines and health products, said biosimilars could be game-changers for access to medicines for certain complex conditions, but they need to be appropriately regulated to ensure therapeutic value and patient safety. She noted that increased use of biosimilars will require patients and prescribers to understand and trust that the benefits of biosimilars substantially outweigh any risk. WHO will be looking to countries with positive experiences with biosimilars, and partner for support in educating prescribers and patients on their benefits.
Similar Survival, Safety for Bevacizumab Biosimilar vs Originator in Colorectal Cancer
February 8th 2025A retrospective observational study found no significant differences in progression-free survival or safety in patients with colorectal cancers in Japan treated with ABP 215, Amgen’s bevacizumab biosimilar, or reference bevacizumab (Avastin), and estimated cost savings of 800,000 Japanese yen (approximately $5100) per patient with the biosimilar.
Biosimilars Oncology Roundup for June 2024—Podcast Edition
July 7th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review biosimilar news coming out of June, with clinical trial results from conferences and a study showcasing how to overcome economic and noneconomic barriers to oncology biosimilars.
The Biosimilar Void: 90% of Biologics Coming Off Patent Will Lack Biosimilars
February 5th 2025Of the 118 biologics losing exclusivity over the next decade, only 10% have biosimilars in development, meaning a vast majority of biologics have no pipeline, which limits savings potential for the health care system.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
Biosimilars Drive Cost Savings and Achieve 53% Market Share Across Treatment Areas
January 16th 2025Biosimilar launches achieve a 53% market share and a 53% reduction in average drug costs after 5 years of biosimilar competition, according to Samsung Bioepis’ most recent market report, showcasing notable pricing trends and market share disparities across therapeutic areas.
The Next Frontier: Oncology Biosimilars in 2025 and Beyond
January 13th 2025The US oncology biosimilar market has rapidly evolved since its launch in 2017, driven by steep price discounts, payer adoption, and provider confidence, with an upcoming wave of biosimilars targeting blockbuster biologics promising further market growth, cost savings, and broader patient access.