After treatment withdrawal, 58.3% of patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) had relapsed. Half of the relapses appeared within 6 months.
Some recent data have indicated that it is feasible to reduce the dose of anti—tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapies in treating spondyloarthritis indications like ankylosing spondylitis (AS). In some cases, patients may stop biologic treatment entirely if they achieve sustained clinical remission, though data do not exist to support such a strategy.
One recent study sought to determine how long patients with AS in persistent clinical remission remained free of disease flares after withdrawing the anti-TNF infliximab, and it found that a majority of patients had clinical relapse within a year.
The multicenter, prospective, observational study included 36 Spanish patients with AS who had received infliximab as a first-line anti-TNF agent and who had been in remission for more than 6 months. Infliximab was withdrawn from these patients, and they were assessed every 6 to 8 weeks for 12 months. Clinical relapse was defined as a Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index score of 4 or higher. Among patients who relapsed, infliximab was reintroduced without an induction phase.
After treatment withdrawal, 12 (33.3%) of the patients remained free of clinical relapse, while 21 (58.3%) had relapsed and 3 patients were lost to follow-up. Half of the relapses appeared within 6 months of the anti-TNF withdrawal.
In the 21 patients who relapsed, infliximab was reintroduced, and 11 patients (52%) regained clinical remission. However, 10 patients (48%) did not regain remission. Among this group, 7 patients had a good clinical response, but in 3 patients, the reintroduced infliximab was ineffective, and the patients had to be cycled to a different anti-TNF agent altogether. No important adverse events were noted with the reintroduction of the drug.
According to the authors, this is the first study to show that, in a majority of patients with AS, withdrawal of infliximab was linked with relapse within 12 months. While reintroduction of infliximab was safe, many patients did not regain remission, and others had loss of efficacy.
While the study was limited by its small sample size, “Overall, the results we reported here suggest that the decision to withdraw treatment should be taken with considerable caution, and it seems unreasonable to propose withdrawal as an objective of the treatment strategy, at least at present, in the absence of any objective predictive factors of persistent clinical remission after treatment withdrawal,” write the authors.
Reference
Moreno M, Gratacós J, Torrente-Segarra T, et al. Withdrawal of infliximab therapy in ankylosing spondylitis in persistent clinical remission, results form the RIMINEA study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019;21:88. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-1873-3.
Breaking Down Biosimilar Barriers: Payer and PBM Policies
November 13th 2024Part 2 of this series for Global Biosimilars Week dives into the complexities of payer and pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) policies, how they impact biosimilar accessibility, and how addressing these issues may look under a second Trump term.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Breaking Barriers in Osteoporosis Care: New Denosumab Biosimilars Wyost, Jubbonti Approved
June 16th 2024In this episode, The Center for Biosimilars® delves into the FDA approval of the first denosumab biosimilars, Wyost and Jubbonti (denosumab-bbdz), and discuss their potential to revolutionize osteoporosis treatment with expert insights from 2 rheumatologists.
Panelists Stress Stakeholder Education to Build Confidence in Biosimilars
October 31st 2024By expanding educational initiatives to clarify biosimilar safety, efficacy, and interchangeability, stakeholders can foster trust, improve access, and ensure that biosimilars are widely accepted as high-quality, cost-effective alternatives to originator biologics.