CVS Caremark reported a decline in drug spending for its clients in 2016, and the pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) believes unbranded drugs—generics and biosimilars—are key to the decline in drug spending, now and in the future.
The company cited the FDA’s research showing that the price of a branded drug drops most dramatically with the entry of the first few generic competitors and continues to fall incrementally as additional generic competitors are marketed. CVS noted that The RAND Corporation estimates that the entry of biosimilar products into specialty markets could reduce spending on biologics by an estimated $44.2 billion over the next decade. The United States needs to speed approvals of generics and biosimilars in order to increase competition and drive down prices, the company believes.
At the beginning of 2017, more than 4000 generic drugs were pending approval with the FDA, CVS noted. In comparison, Europe approves drugs more quickly than the United States and has 20 biosimilars on the market compared with just 4 in the United States (5 after the recent approval of adalimumab-abda). To unlock cost savings for US patients, taxpayers, and the healthcare system as a whole, the flow of generics and biosimilars must be increased, CVS Caremark stated.
Generic drugs had the largest deflationary impact on prescription drug spending for CVS Caremark in 2014, the company reported. Generic spending fell following a 1.4% increase in generic dispensing rates, along with relatively low overall inflation and falling prices for most generics. Even though fewer generics were launched in 2016, rosuvastatin (the generic for Crestor) was a major approval, the company noted. In addition, many payers have taken a more aggressive approach to promoting generics.
The approval and launch of more biosimilars in the future will also help overall prescription drug spending, especially for specialty drugs, which account for about 36% of what is spent for CVS’ PBM clients. Competition from biosimilars could help bring down prices for these expensive products, CVS Caremark stated, pointing out that although a biosimilar for adalimumab (Humira) was approved in 2016 and more adalimumab biosimilars are in the pipeline, it is expected that patent litigation will delay a launch of any competitive products in 2017.
Cost-Efficiency in Action: Denmark's Transition to Biosimilar Adalimumab
January 14th 2025The nationwide mandatory switch from Humira (reference adalimumab) to biosimilar adalimumab in Denmark led to no increase in total health care costs over 9 months, with significant cost reductions for those who switched to GP2017 specifically, highlighting the economic feasibility of biosimilar adoption.
Biosimilars Gastroenterology Roundup for November 2024—Podcast Edition
December 1st 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss market changes in the adalimumab space; calls for PBM transparency and biosimilar access reforms grew; new data for biosimilars in gastroenterology conditions; and all the takeaways from this year's Global Biosimilars Week.
Eye on Pharma: Korean Drugmakers’ Impact in Europe; New Denosumab, Eculizumab Deals
January 11th 2025Korean drugmakers hold over 50% market share in the 6 best-selling biosimilar markets, 2 companies sign exclusive licensing partnership for a denosumab biosimilar, and 2 others join forces for an eculizumab biosimilar.
Biosimilars Development Roundup for October 2024—Podcast Edition
November 3rd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the GRx+Biosims conference, which included discussions on data transparency, artificial intelligence (AI), and collaboration to enhance the global supply chain for biosimilars and generic drugs, as well as the evolving requirements for biosimilar devices.
Equivalence Confirmed: CT-P41 Paves the Way for Affordable Osteoporosis Care
January 8th 2025Celltrion’s denosumab biosimilar demonstrated equivalent efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity compared with the originator in a phase 3 trial involving postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, paving the way for improved accessibility and cost savings in osteoporosis treatment.