- Bone Health
- Immunology
- Hematology
- Respiratory
- Dermatology
- Diabetes
- Gastroenterology
- Neurology
- Oncology
- Ophthalmology
- Rare Disease
- Rheumatology
2 Arrested in Samsung Bioepis Accounting Probe
On Monday, the Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office in the Republic of Korea arrested an executive and another employee at biosimilar developer Samsung Bioepis for falsifying and destroying evidence and for violating audit law.
According to the Financial Times and other sources, on Monday, the Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office in the Republic of Korea arrested an executive and another employee at biosimilar developer Samsung Bioepis for falsifying and destroying evidence and for violating audit law.
In November 2018, Korean regulators from the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) said that, in 2015, Samsung BioLogics used accounting methods that allegedly misrepresented the value of the biosimilar maker prior to an initial public offering in 2016.
According to officials, Samsung BioLogics changed the way it accounted for its stake in Samsung Bioepis, a partnership with Biogen, by recognizing the partnership’s market value instead of its book value, thereby inflating its valuation.
According to Korea Biomedical Review, the arrest warrants that were executed this week are the first to be filed in the case and relate to data that may have been deleted from computers and mobile phones.
These data could be relevant, said officials, to determining whether Biogen’s contractual option to increase its share in the Samsung Bioepis partnership to 49.9% was hidden from accountants who were responsible for a merger between Cheil Industries and Samsung in 2015. Biogen announced in 2018 that it would exercise its option.
The arrests are the latest development in the probe that, last year, resulted in a $7.05 million fine, the suspension of Samsung BioLogics’ stock trading, and calls for the firing of the firm’s chief executive officer as well as the chief financial officer.
The company’s stock subsequently resumed trading in December 2018 after officials ruled that the company’s shares could remain listed while the case played out.
Then, in January of this year, a Korean court ruled that penalties against Samsung BioLogics should be suspended pending a final court determination on whether the company had indeed violated accounting standards.
For its part, Samsung BioLogics has maintained that it has not breached any accounting rules. In late 2018, the company launched an administrative lawsuit with the aim of proving the legality of its actions.
Review Calls for Path to Global Harmonization of Biosimilar Development Regulations
March 17th 2025Global biosimilar regulatory harmonization will be needed to reduce development costs and improve patient access, despite challenges posed by differing national requirements and regulatory frameworks, according to review authors.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
From Amjevita to Zarxio: A Decade of US Biosimilar Approvals
March 6th 2025Since the FDA’s groundbreaking approval of Zarxio in 2015, the US biosimilars market has surged to 67 approvals across 18 originators—though the journey has been anything but smooth, with adoption facing hurdles along the way.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Biosimilar Approvals Streamlined With Advanced Statistics Amidst Differing Regulatory Requirements
February 25th 2025The FDA and European Medicines Agency (EMA) mandate high similarity between biosimilars and reference products, but their regulatory processes differ, especially with multiple reference products.
