Two posters presented today at the American College of Rheumatology’s 2017 meeting in San Diego, California, highlight the gaps in US rheumatologists’ knowledge concerning biosimilar therapies, and underscore the importance of greater physician education about biosimilar medicines.
Two posters presented today at the American College of Rheumatology’s 2017 meeting in San Diego, California, highlight the gaps in US rheumatologists’ knowledge concerning biosimilar therapies, and underscore the importance of greater physician education about biosimilar medicines.
The first poster1 presented results of a survey, conducted by Allan Gibofsky, MD, and Sam Badawi, PharmD, that was developed to evaluate US rheumatologists’ familiarity with biosimilars. Areas of consideration included the concept of biosimilarity and the approval pathway for biosimilars.
The researchers administered a 20-question survey, using WebMD, between December 9-14, 2016. Respondents (n = 131) were members of Medscape.com, and had been invited via e-mail to participate in the survey. Data were collected from 102 participants who identified themselves as rheumatologists who had practiced in the United States for 1 year or longer. All but 1 respondent had prescribed an anti—tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agent to treat a patient with an autoimmune disease.
When the physicians were asked to identify the status of biosimilars in the United States as of December 2016, 84% of respondents were aware that an infliximab had been approved by the FDA. However, only 47% were aware that the FDA had approved an adalimumab biosimilar, and only 34% were aware that the FDA had approved an etanercept biosimilar.
Most physicians had extreme (38%) or moderate (36%) familiarity with the FDA’s definition of a biosimilar, and most (71%) were aware that a biosimilar that gained FDA approval was not automatically deemed interchangeable.
Respondents also ranked the following as very important or moderately important:
With respect to initiating treatment, 66% were extremely likely or likely to initiate treatment with a biosimilar in treatment-naïve patients with rheumatoid arthritis if the approval of the biosimilar included efficacy and safety studies in the same indication, while fewer were extremely likely (5%) or likely (29%) to do so if the approval was based on data obtained from studies in another rheumatologic indication.
Approximately 60% of respondents were unlikely to switch from a reference biologic to a biosimilar in patients who were responding well to their current therapy. Additionally, 21% of respondents were extremely likely or likely to switch to a biosimilar if the patient was failing to respond well to the originator.
The researchers concluded that the results of this survey support a need to further educate US rheumatologists about biosimilars, the extrapolation of indications, and interchangeability, and that physicians have knowledge gaps that range from an understanding of the concept of biosimilarity to the availability of approved biosimilar therapies.
The second poster2 presented the findings of Janna Radtchenko, MBA, and colleagues, who conducted a survey of 24 community rheumatologists and 20 rheumatology practice managers during a live meeting in April 2017. The respondents represented practices of various sizes and geographic locations across the United States. The researchers, gathering data with the use of audience response technology, found the following:
Responses to the question “Which issues are most concerning?” included the following, in descending order of frequency:
Respondents named information about safety and efficacy, guidelines on when to prescribe a reference versus a biosimilar, and information about reimbursement as key tools for achieving a greater understanding of biosimilars.
The researchers concluded that physicians’ perceptions of biosimilars for rheumatologic indications present a significant barrier for the adoption of biosimilars, and that greater education may improve perceptions and facilitate more biosimilar usage.
References
1. Gibofsky A, Badawi S. Biosimilar knowledge among US rheumatologists—a survey. Presented at the American College of Rheumatology 2017 meeting, November 6, 2017; San Diego, California. Abstract 1037. acrabstracts.org/abstract/biosimilar-knowledge-among-us-rheumatologists-a-survey/.
2. Radtchenko J, Smith Y, Kish J, Feinberg B. Perceptions of US community rheumatologists on biosimilars. Presented at the American College of Rheumatology 2017 meeting, November 6, 2017; San Diego, California. Abstract 1040. acrabstracts.org/abstract/perceptions-of-us-community-rheumatologists-on-biosimilars/.
Addressing Patent Abuse, Reimbursement Models Key to Sustainable Biosimilar Market
April 25th 2025Sonia T. Oskouei, PharmD, emphasized strategies to streamline regulations and evolve to overcome barriers and expand the availability of cost-effective biosimilar treatments across more therapeutic areas.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Decade of Biosimilars Yields $36 Billion in Savings and Strengthens Supply Chain
April 24th 2025Dracey Poore, MS, director of biosimilars and emerging therapies at Cardinal Health, highlighted that biosimilars saved $36 billion over the last decade by improving patient access and the supply chain, but continued education and a robust pipeline are crucial for future growth.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
How State Substitution Laws Shape Insulin Biosimilar Adoption
April 15th 2025States with fewer restrictions on biosimilar substitution tend to see higher uptake of interchangeable insulin glargine, showing how even small policy details can significantly influence biosimilar adoption and expand access to more affordable insulin.
Latest Biosimilar Deals Signal Growth Across Immunology, Oncology Markets
April 14th 2025During Q1 2025, pharmaceutical companies accelerated biosimilar expansion through strategic acquisitions and partnerships in hopes of boosting patient access to lower-cost treatments in immunology and oncology.