At 6 months and 1 year, respectively, survival rates among the suboptimal responders who stayed on their index anti–tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agent were 90.2% and 85.1%, respectively.
Using anti—tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents in the treatment of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is associated with good efficacy and improvements in pain, disease activity, and physical function. However, some patients do not have a good response to anti-TNF therapies, and in a recent study, researchers found that a significant proportion of patients with axSpA continue with anti-TNF therapy despite their suboptimal outcomes.
The researchers performed a retrospective analysis of 499 patients with axSpA who were treated at 2 centers in the United Kingdom between 2002 and 2016.
The proportion of patients who had a suboptimal response to anti-TNFs—classified as having a 2-point or higher reduction in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score without reaching BASDAI criteria for a 50% improvement and with BASDAI remaining at a score of 4 or above at 6 months—was 16.4%.
In this group, 78% were male, 95.1% had ankylosing spondylitis, and 82.1% were positive for Human leukocyte antigen B27. Mean (SD) time to diagnosis was 10 (8.6) years, age at diagnosis was 37 (11.7) years, and age at starting the index anti-TNF agent was 48 (11.1) years. Univariate and multivariate analyses of suboptimal responders showed that older age at starting anti-TNF therapy was the best predictor of suboptimal response.
The anti-TNF agents used in this group of suboptimal responders were adalimumab (50%), etanercept (32.9%), infliximab (6.1%), golimumab (3.7%), and certolizumab pegol (7.3%).
At 6 months and 1 year, respectively, survival rates among the suboptimal responders who stayed on their index anti-TNF agent were 90.2% and 85.1%. The rate of attrition was greater among suboptimal responders at 2 years and 5 years, but at 10 years, there was no difference between responders and suboptimal responders (67.6% and 68.4%; P = .064).
Notably, although more than 90% of patients with a suboptimal response remained on their index anti-TNF therapy at 6 months, the option for switching to different anti-TNF agents was available in both of the 2 centers where the patients were treated.
According to the authors, “a significant proportion of patients continued [anti-TNFs] despite demonstrating a sub-optimal response,” and further studies will be needed to understand suboptimal response among patients with axSpA, as well as to investigate the best treatment choices for this group of patients.
Reference
Yahya F, Gaffney K, Sengupta R. Exploring sub-optimal response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in axial spondyloarthritis. Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2019;3(1):rkzo12. PMCID: PMC6649897.
13 Strategies to Avoid the Nocebo Effect During Biosimilar Switching
December 18th 2024A systematic review identified 13 strategies, including patient and provider education, empathetic communication, and shared decision-making, to mitigate the nocebo effect in biosimilar switching, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach to improve patient perceptions and therapeutic outcomes.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Commercial Payer Coverage of Biosimilars: Market Share, Pricing, and Policy Shifts
December 4th 2024Researchers observe significant shifts in payer preferences for originator vs biosimilar products from 2017 to 2022, revealing growing payer interest in multiple product options, alongside the increasing market share of biosimilars, which contributed to notable reductions in both average sales prices and wholesale acquisition costs.
What AmerisourceBergen's Report Reveals About Payers, Biosimilar Pricing Trends
May 28th 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Tasmina Hydery and Brian Biehn from AmerisourceBergen discussed results from a recent survey, that were also presented at Asembia 2023, diving into the payer perspective on biosimilars and current pricing trends across the US biosimilar industry.
Boosting Health Care Sustainability: The Role of Biosimilars in Latin America
November 21st 2024Biosimilars could improve access to biologic treatments and health care sustainability in Latin America, but their adoption is hindered by misconceptions, regulatory gaps, and weak pharmacovigilance, requiring targeted education and stronger regulations.
Breaking Down Biosimilar Barriers: Payer and PBM Policies
November 13th 2024Part 2 of this series for Global Biosimilars Week dives into the complexities of payer and pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) policies, how they impact biosimilar accessibility, and how addressing these issues may look under a second Trump term.