One main reason for increasing insulin prices is rebates. During the April 10, 2019 United States House Energy and Commerce Committee hearing titled “Priced Out of a Lifesaving Drug: getting Answers on the Rising Cost of Insulin” manufacturers, pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), and congressional representatives discussed the effects rebates were having on prices. Currently, manufacturers pay rebates to health plans or PBMs in exchange for formulary access, which is a major reason we see manufacturer net pricing declining but list prices increasing.
As the drug price debate grows in momentum, we are now starting to hear more about the spike in the costs of insulin. Why? According to the CDC, more than 100 million US adults are now living with diabetes or prediabetes. Each year, 1.4 million Americans are diagnosed with diabetes, while approximately 6 million Americans with diabetes use a form of insulin. With so many people impacted by the growing prevalence of the chronic disease, insulin has become a trending topic in the discussion about high drug costs.
One main reason for increasing insulin prices is rebates. During the April 10, 2019 United States House Energy and Commerce Committee hearing titled “Priced Out of a Lifesaving Drug: getting Answers on the Rising Cost of Insulin” manufacturers, pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), and congressional representatives discussed the effects rebates were having on prices. Currently, manufacturers pay rebates to health plans or PBMs in exchange for formulary access, which is a major reason we see manufacturer net pricing declining but list prices increasing.
Thus far, Congress has been active with insulin pricing. In addition to the Congressional Diabetes Caucus’ 2018 Report on Insulin, Congress has 2 bills on point: the Affordable Insulin Act of 2019 proposes to allow for the importation of affordable and safe insulin by wholesale distributors, pharmacies, and individuals, while the Insulin Access for All Act of 2019 proposes to eliminate cost sharing with respect to coverage of insulin as a covered Medicare Part D drug or as a covered outpatient drug under the Medicaid program.
These bills follow in the footsteps of Nevada’s trendsetting approach to drug price transparency. In 2017, the state’s first-in-the-nation insulin price transparency law targeted diabetes products and required PBMs and manufacturers to disclose pricing and rebate information, among other things. In 2018, the manufacturing lobby dropped its legal opposition to the law, as it stated that Nevada’s adopted regulations resolved outstanding concerns.
The FDA, which has been taking an aggressive approach in attempting to lower drug costs, has also weighed in on the insulin debate. Former Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, MD, stated in response to the statutory mandate of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act that “Starting in March 2020, the approved marketing applications for the small subset of ‘biological products’ such as insulin and human growth hormone...will be deemed to be biologics. Once an interchangeable insulin product is approved and available on the market, it can then be substituted for the reference product at the pharmacy, potentially leading to increased access and significantly lower costs for patients.”
Lastly, anticipating the growing need for insulin biosimilars, Sandoz has offered a solution of its own to higher insulin prices. In December 2018, the company announced its agreement with Chinese drug maker Gan and Lee to commercialize biosimilar insulins to treat patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.
Hopefully the inclusion of insulin via an FDA established biosimilar pathway will create a healthier marketplace by lowering insulin prices and improving both patient outcomes and access.
Biosimilar and Biologic Use Increasing in Greek Patients With IBD
April 19th 2025A retrospective study from a single inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) center in Greece reported that from 2018 to 2022, the use of biologics increased by 28% yearly, and the proportion of patients using biosimilars grew from 33% to 67%.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
President Trump Signs Executive Order to Bring Down Drug Prices
April 16th 2025To help bring down sky-high drug prices, President Donald Trump signed an executive order pushing for faster biosimilar development, more transparency, and tougher rules on pharmacy benefit managers—aiming to save billions and make meds more affordable for everyone.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Latest Biosimilar Deals Signal Growth Across Immunology, Oncology Markets
April 14th 2025During Q1 2025, pharmaceutical companies accelerated biosimilar expansion through strategic acquisitions and partnerships in hopes of boosting patient access to lower-cost treatments in immunology and oncology.
Experts Pressure Congress to Remove Roadblocks for Biosimilars
April 12th 2025Lawmakers and expert witnesses emphasized the potential of biosimilars to lower health care costs by overcoming barriers like pharmacy benefit manager practices, limited awareness, and regulatory delays to improve access and competition in chronic disease management during a recent congressional hearing.