After the Association for Accessible Medicines’ (AAM’s) Access! 2019 annual meeting came to a close last week, The Center for Biosimilars® spoke with Christine Simmon, senior vice president of policy and strategic alliances, AAM, and executive director, AAM’s Biosimilars Council, to get her take on some of the outcomes of the meeting.
After the Association for Accessible Medicines’ (AAM’s) Access! 2019 annual meeting came to a close last week, The Center for Biosimilars® spoke with Christine Simmon, senior vice president of policy and strategic alliances, AAM, and executive director, AAM’s Biosimilars Council, to get her take on some of the outcomes of the meeting.
“I think one of the biggest takeaways from the meeting was the continuing importance of biosimilars. Of course, we had a dedicated biosimilars session, but biosimilars really came up in every session, and I thought that was very telling,” said Simmon.
The biosimilars session she referenced included a panel during which various biosimilar stakeholders and industry experts discussed how to identify and address “biosimilar shenanigans.” The opening presenter of the session, Carol Lynch, president of Sandoz US and head of North America, explained that data show that if all FDA-approved biosimilars had been marketed in a timely manner, Americans could have saved $4.5 billion.
Simmon touched upon this issue as well, stating that “There are significant concerns about the viability and ultimately the sustainability in the [United States].” Interestingly, Simmon noted that in her own discussions with meeting attendees, she “heard recognition from more people that the European successes around biosimilars—which are still very praise worthy—is evolving there to a sustainability issue as well.” She stressed that while the US biosimilar market has not nearly reached its peak, stakeholders need to start planning ahead for the sustainability of the market.
The importance of the biosimilars market, as well as the savings it could achieve for patients, was referenced also in the closing keynote address delivered by HHS Secretary Alex Azar. “Biologic drugs, today, represent almost 40% of prescription drug spending. The challenges are real, but so is the potential for competition and savings. Imagine doing to 40% of the pharmaceutical market just some fraction of what generics have already done to the other 60%,” said Azar. He went on to discuss how he intends to achieve these savings and increased uptake in biosimilars: pharmacy-level interchangeability.
Simmon explained that interchangeability has been a hot topic for AAM’s Biosimilars Council, too. “A major focus area for the council is educating around interchangeability and misinformation. Not even so much how to do interchangeability, but to some degree, I guess you could say the interplay between interchangeability designations and market uptake,” she said. “It’s another misconception—and we’ve heard this misconception among payers and physicians as well—that they’re waiting for interchangeability to really get on board with biosimilars.”
FDA has been working on finalizing a guidance around interchangeability and how biosimilar developers can achieve the designation. The guidance is expected to be released in the upcoming months.
Empowering Vulnerable Populations: The Path to Equitable Biologic Therapy Access
December 22nd 2024Elie Bahou, PharmD, senior vice president and system chief pharmacy officer at Providence, discusses strategies to improve equitable access to biologic therapies, including tiered formularies, income-based cost sharing, patient assistance programs, and fostering payer partnerships.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
BioRationality: Withdrawal of Proposed Terminal Disclaimer Rule Spells Major Setback for Biosimilars
December 10th 2024The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)’s withdrawal of its proposed terminal disclaimer rule is seen as a setback for biosimilar developers, as it preserves patent prosecution practices that favor originator companies and increases costs for biosimilar competition, according to Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD.
Commercial Payer Coverage of Biosimilars: Market Share, Pricing, and Policy Shifts
December 4th 2024Researchers observe significant shifts in payer preferences for originator vs biosimilar products from 2017 to 2022, revealing growing payer interest in multiple product options, alongside the increasing market share of biosimilars, which contributed to notable reductions in both average sales prices and wholesale acquisition costs.
Perceptions of Biosimilar Switching Among Veterans With IBD
December 2nd 2024Veterans with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) prioritize shared decision-making, transparency, and individualized care in biosimilar switching, favoring delayed switching for severe cases and greater patient control.