In an ongoing litigation over biosimilar adalimumab, AbbVie, maker of the blockbuster reference adalimumab (Humira), denied biosimilar developer Boehringer Ingelheim’s claims that the company has been padding its patent estate with overlapping patents in an effort to protect its drug from competition.
In an ongoing litigation over biosimilar adalimumab, AbbVie, maker of the blockbuster reference adalimumab (Humira), denied biosimilar developer Boehringer Ingelheim’s (BI) claims that the company has been padding its patent estate with overlapping patents in an effort to protect its drug from competition.
In September, BI claimed that “[AbbVie] engaged in a pattern of pursuing numerous overlapping and non-inventive patents for the purpose of developing a ‘patent thicket,’ using the patenting process itself as a means to seek to delay competition against its expensive and lucrative adalimumab product.”
BI went on to claim that the alleged patenting strategy had produced more than 100 adalimumab patents for AbbVie, and that all 74 such patents under dispute in the current case “stem from less than half as many patent families.” BI said that, while adalimumab itself is a “true scientific achievement,” what AbbVie has patented—namely formulations, production processes, and dosing regimens—do not represent such scientific achievements. The biosimilar developer pointed to recent inter partes review (IPR) proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal board that found that the reference Humira’s success was not due to methods of treatment, but due to the innovative nature of the adalimumab antibody.
In its answer, AbbVie put forth a number of affirmative defenses against BI’s counterclaims, including the assertion that relief could not be granted for any of BI’s counterclaims, and that BI has not complied with the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act. AbbVie asked the court to deny all relief sought by BI and to dismiss all counterclaims in the suit.
AbbVie originally filed suit against BI in August, seeking a judgment that the biosimilar developer has infringed or will infringe on 1 or more of AbbVie’s patents by manufacturing or offering its product, Cyltezo, for sale in the United States. AbbVie also seeks a preliminary and permanent injunction to prevent BI from infringing on patents covering Humira.
BI is the second biosimilar developer to gain FDA approval for a biosimilar adalimumab and face extensive patent litigation with AbbVie; in September 2016, Amgen gained US regulatory approval for its adalimumab biosimilar, Amjevita. Last month, Amgen announced that it had reached a settlement with AbbVie that will allow it to begin marketing the biosimilar in January 2023. The settlement also provided for the European launch of the drug, under the slightly altered name Amgevita, in October 2018.
President Trump Signs Executive Order to Bring Down Drug Prices
April 16th 2025To help bring down sky-high drug prices, President Donald Trump signed an executive order pushing for faster biosimilar development, more transparency, and tougher rules on pharmacy benefit managers—aiming to save billions and make meds more affordable for everyone.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Risk-Adjusted NPV Framework for Biosimilars Shows Key Investment Drivers
April 7th 2025Early market entry, manufacturing efficiency, and market share are critical to biosimilar development success, while technical complexity and competition heavily impact returns, according to a study presenting a risk-adjusted net present value (NPV) analysis framework.