US voters will head to the polls next week in the midterm elections, and in the run-up to the election, the Kaiser Family Foundation has revealed that pharmaceutical companies have donated nearly $79 million to members of Congress over the past 6 election cycles.
US voters will head to the polls next week in the midterm elections, and in the run-up to the election, the Kaiser Family Foundation has revealed that pharmaceutical companies have, over the past 6 election cycles, donated nearly $79 million to members of Congress.
These findings come from Kaiser’s newly launched “Pharma Cash to Congress” tool, which uses campaign finance reports from the Federal Election Commission. The interactive tool allows users to explore which lawmakers have received the biggest contributions from pharma, and which companies have given the most. Voters can search for members of congress to find detailed breakdowns of contributions received from individual pharmaceutical companies both in the current election cycle and since 2007.
According to Kaiser, since the beginning of 2017, 34 lawmakers have each received more than $100,000 each from drug makers’ political action committees (PACs), and 2 representatives—Kevin McCarthy, R-California, and Greg Walden, R-Oregon, have accepted more than $200,000 each.
More Republicans (209) than Democrats (185) received contributions, with Republican representatives and senators receiving a total of $4.9 million and $2.1 million, respectively, and Democratic representatives and senators receiving $3.3 million and $1.6 million, respectively, as of June 30, 2018. During the 2010 election cycle, when Democrats were in power, a greater amount of donated dollars went to Democratic lawmakers.
Among companies who contributed the most were Pfizer ($1.02 million), Amgen ($946,000), AbbVie ($852,000), and Abbot Laboratories ($703,000).
Kaiser also notes that donations to lawmakers in election cycles tell only part of the story of pharma’s influence in US politics; its “Pre$cription for Power” tool, released in April of this year, tracked donations to patient advocacy groups that, it says, “provide patients to testify on Capitol Hill and organize social media campaigns on drugmakers’ behalf.”
Kaiser’s research into these donatiosn revealed that pharmaceutical companies gave $116 million to patient groups in 2015 alone, raising concerns that patient groups’ advocacy, and eventually the nation’s health policy, could be negatively impacted by pharma’s dollars.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
From Amjevita to Zarxio: A Decade of US Biosimilar Approvals
March 6th 2025Since the FDA’s groundbreaking approval of Zarxio in 2015, the US biosimilars market has surged to 67 approvals across 18 originators—though the journey has been anything but smooth, with adoption facing hurdles along the way.