The FDA's Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee (ODAC) briefing documents state that the totality of the evidence suggests that the proposed biosimilar is highly similar to its US-licensed reference, despite minor differences in clinically inactive compounds.
Ahead of the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee (ODAC) that will convene on Wednesday, October 10, 2018, the FDA has released briefing documents containing much of the data, (though some redacted) of the Biologics License Application (BLA) for CT-P10, a proposed rituximab biosimilar referenced on Genentech’s Rituxan and developed by Celltrion.
The FDA’s documents state that the totality of the evidence suggests that the proposed biosimilar is highly similar to its US-licensed reference, despite minor differences in clinically inactive compounds.
The analytical similarity data package included in the BLA that was submitted to the FDA consisted of 3 comparisons: CT-P10 to Rituxan; CT-P10 to the European Union's version of Rituxan, licensed as MabThera; and EU-licensed MabThera to the US-licensed Rituxan. The FDA noted that “the analytical methods were appropriately validated or qualified and are suitable for their intended use.”
Click here to read more about Wednesday’s ODAC meeting.
During the meeting, the committee will vote on whether to recommend approval of CT-P10 as a biosimilar product for the treatment of adult patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Notably, Celltrion is not seeking approval for the indication of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), despite the fact that the FDA will be considering immunogenicity data in which CT-P10 and Rituxan were compared in a multiple-dose parallel-arm study in patients with RA. The data indicate that there was no increase in immunogenicity risks for CT-P10 as compared with Rituxan in this population, and no increased safety risk with a single transition from US-licensed Rituxan to CT-P10.
While Celltrion’s application was originally submitted in April 2017, the FDA issued a Complete Response Letter (CRL) in February 2018 regarding “clinical, product quality, and facility deficiencies.” After resolving the concerns outlined in the CRL, Celltrion resubmitted the BLA in May. If approved, CT-P10 would become the United States’ first biosimilar rituximab.
The ODAC is set to convene at 8:00 AM, Eastern Standard Time.
Boosting Health Care Sustainability: The Role of Biosimilars in Latin America
November 21st 2024Biosimilars could improve access to biologic treatments and health care sustainability in Latin America, but their adoption is hindered by misconceptions, regulatory gaps, and weak pharmacovigilance, requiring targeted education and stronger regulations.
Biosimilars Oncology Roundup for June 2024—Podcast Edition
July 7th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review biosimilar news coming out of June, with clinical trial results from conferences and a study showcasing how to overcome economic and noneconomic barriers to oncology biosimilars.
Eye on Pharma: EU Aflibercept Approvals; Biosimilars Canada Campaign; Celltrion Data
November 19th 2024The European Commission grants marketing authorization to 2 aflibercept biosimilars; Biosimilars Canada launches new campaign to provide sustainable solutions to employers; Celltrion shares positive data for 2 biosimilars.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
Eye on Pharma: Henlius, Organon Updates; Meitheal Portfolio Expansion; Celltrion Zymfentra Data
November 5th 2024Henlius and Organon’s pertuzumab biosimilar met phase 3 goals; Meitheal expanded its US biosimilars; Celltrion’s subcutaneous infliximab (Zymfentra) showed monotherapy could be as effective as combination therapy for inflammatory bowel disease.
BioRationality: Should mRNA Copies Be Filed as NDAs or Biosimilars?
November 4th 2024The article by Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, argues that the FDA’s classification of future copies of messenger RNA (mRNA) products could be reconsidered, suggesting they might be eligible for new drug applications (NDAs) or a hybrid biosimilar category due to their unique characteristics and increasing prevalence.