Alberta became the most recent Canadian provincial government to mandate a nonmedical switch to biosimilars for certain patients on taxpayer-funded drug plans.
Alberta became the most recent Canadian provincial government to mandate a nonmedical switch to biosimilars for certain patients on taxpayer-funded drug plans.
Six months ago, British Columbia was the first province to require eligible patients currently on a reference product to switch to a biosimilar. Manitoba announced a similar program recently, and Ontario appears to be thinking about it.
The change begins July 1, 2020 for patients on government-sponsored pharmaceutical plans.
In a statement Thursday, Alberta’s minister of health said switching to biosimilars will save between $227 million (US $172 million) and $380 million (US $289 million) over the next 4 years.
Alberta, which is calling the plan the Biosimilar Initiative, said spending for originator biologics has increased from $21 million (US $16 million) to $238 million (US $181 million) over the past 10 years.
Medical exception requests will be reviewed by specialists from rheumatology, gastroenterology, endocrinology, and neurology, and pediatric patients and pregnant women are exempted from the policy.
However, the announcement drew criticism from Crohn’s and Colitis Canada, which called the decision “very shortsighted and potentially harmful.” In particular the organization criticized the decision to include what they described a restrictive tiering component.
"The tiering component forces patients onto intravenous therapy, meaning at least 6 to 10 days per year where they must seek treatment at an infusion center,” said Mina Mawani, president and chief executive officer of Crohn’s and Colitis Canada. “Taking away the option of a subcutaneous [inflammatory bowel disease] therapy is a hard fit for young people in the workforce and those in remote areas of the province,” she said adding that it is also a quality-of-life issue.
According to The Globe and Mail, the tiered framework will limit pharmaceutical choices for patients with rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn disease who are starting therapy for the first time. The paper said the list price for infliximab, when sold as the brand name Remicade, is $962.68 (US $731.35) per vial, while the biosimilars Inflectra and Renfeixis cost $525 (US $398.85) and $493 (US $374.53) per vial, respectively.
The policy will also cover Enbrel, Lantus, and Neulasta, and Neupogen, as well as patients currently taking glatiramer acetate (Copaxone) for multiple sclerosis, even though it is not technically a biologic.
About 26,000 patients are affected.
In a related statement, Adrian Dix, the minister of health for British Columbia, congratulated Alberta on the move. Dix also said they estimate that in British Columbia up to 70% of infliximab and etanercept patients have switched to a biosimilar, as well as 33% of those on insulin glargine.
The head of Biosimilars Canada also cheered the move.
"The decisions of the Alberta and British Columbia governments to implement biosimilar switching initiatives demonstrate continued confidence in biosimilars as a way to manage costs while supporting positive patient outcomes," said Jim Keon, president of Biosimilars Canada. "Switching to biosimilar treatments is the responsible choice for drug programs, and it is time for other provinces to bring the benefits of biosimilar switching programs to their patients, health care providers and taxpayers."
The Biosimilars Forum also praised the decision. “Following Europe’s lead, [3] Canadian provinces have now recognized the substantial cost-savings associated with increased patient utilization of biosimilars…it’s clear that policymakers need to take action to foster and sustain a robust biosimilars market that lowers costs for patients and the health care system at-large,” said the organization in a statement.
13 Strategies to Avoid the Nocebo Effect During Biosimilar Switching
December 18th 2024A systematic review identified 13 strategies, including patient and provider education, empathetic communication, and shared decision-making, to mitigate the nocebo effect in biosimilar switching, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach to improve patient perceptions and therapeutic outcomes.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Commercial Payer Coverage of Biosimilars: Market Share, Pricing, and Policy Shifts
December 4th 2024Researchers observe significant shifts in payer preferences for originator vs biosimilar products from 2017 to 2022, revealing growing payer interest in multiple product options, alongside the increasing market share of biosimilars, which contributed to notable reductions in both average sales prices and wholesale acquisition costs.
The Rebate War: How Originator Companies Are Fighting Back Against Biosimilars
November 25th 2024Few biologics in the US have multiple biosimilar competitors, but originator biologics respond quickly to competition by increasing rebates and lowering net prices, despite short approval-to-launch timelines for biosimilars.
Boosting Health Care Sustainability: The Role of Biosimilars in Latin America
November 21st 2024Biosimilars could improve access to biologic treatments and health care sustainability in Latin America, but their adoption is hindered by misconceptions, regulatory gaps, and weak pharmacovigilance, requiring targeted education and stronger regulations.