A recently published study shows that Amgen’s ABP 501 (Amjevita), referenced on Humira, shows that the product has similar efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity to its reference in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis.
A recently published study shows that Amgen’s ABP 501 (Amjevita), the first adalimumab biosimilar referenced on Humira to be approved by the FDA for the treatment of multiple inflammatory diseases, shows that the product has similar clinical efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity to its reference in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
Previous phase 1 clinical studies of ABP 501 have demonstrated its pharmacokinetic (PK) equivalence to adalimumab as well as its similarity in clinical efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity compared with reference adalimumab. Two phase 3 studies were undertaken comparing ABP 501 with reference adalimumab, 1 in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, and 1 in patients with moderate to severe RA. The latter study, by Stanley Cohen, MD, and colleagues, was published online in the Annals of Rheumatologic Disease. The authors report that the phase 3 study, funded by Amgen, demonstrates that ABP 501 is similar to reference adalimumab in clinical efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity in patients with moderate to severe RA.
The randomized, double-blind, active comparator—controlled, 26-week equivalence study enrolled adalimumab-naïve patients, with moderate to severe RA despite methotrexate treatment, who were randomized 1:1 to receive ABP 501 or reference adalimumab. Patients received 40  mg of the biosimilar or reference adalimumab subcutaneously on day 1, and then every 2 weeks until week 22.
The primary endpoint was risk ratio (RR) of the American College of Rheumatology’s (ACR) ACR20 measurement of symptoms (20% improvement in tender and swollen joint counts, patient assessments of pain, global disease activity and physical function, physician global assessment of disease activity, and acute phase reactant) between groups at week 24.
Secondary endpoints included another measure of RA disease activity, the Disease Activity Score 28-joint count-C reactive protein (DAS28-CRP). Safety was assessed by adverse events (AEs) and laboratory evaluations. Immunogenicity was assessed by monitoring antidrug antibodies (ADAs).
Of the 526 randomized patients—264 in the ABP 501 arm and 262 in the adalimumab arm—494 completed the study. At week 24, the ACR20 response was 74.6% for the ABP 501 group and 72.4% for the adalimumab group. The RR of ACR20 between groups was 1.039, confirming the primary hypothesis that the 2 treatments were equivalent.
Changes from baseline on all measurements were similar. There were no clinically meaningful differences in AEs and laboratory abnormalities, and 38.3% (ABP 501) and 38.2% (reference adalimumab) of patients tested positive for binding ADAs. The researchers concluded that ABP 501 and reference adalimumab have similar safety profiles. “No new safety signals were detected in this study compared with other adalimumab clinical trials in patients with RA,” they noted. “Hypersensitivity reactions were reported infrequently and occurred at a generally similar frequency in both treatment groups.”
In conclusion, the researchers say that data from this study show that the clinical efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of ABP 501 are similar to that of reference adalimumab in patients with moderate to severe RA. Analytical, biofunctional, and PK properties of ABP 501 have previously been shown to be highly similar to those of reference adalimumab. Thus, taken together, these data contribute to the totality-of-evidence—based requirements to demonstrate that ABP 501 is similar to reference adalimumab. The FDA’s approval of ABP 501 (Amjevita) adalimumab biosimilar has provided a valuable new therapeutic option for the treatment of moderate to severe RA.
Boosting Health Care Sustainability: The Role of Biosimilars in Latin America
November 21st 2024Biosimilars could improve access to biologic treatments and health care sustainability in Latin America, but their adoption is hindered by misconceptions, regulatory gaps, and weak pharmacovigilance, requiring targeted education and stronger regulations.
Biosimilars Development Roundup for October 2024—Podcast Edition
November 3rd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the GRx+Biosims conference, which included discussions on data transparency, artificial intelligence (AI), and collaboration to enhance the global supply chain for biosimilars and generic drugs, as well as the evolving requirements for biosimilar devices.
Eye on Pharma: EU Aflibercept Approvals; Biosimilars Canada Campaign; Celltrion Data
November 19th 2024The European Commission grants marketing authorization to 2 aflibercept biosimilars; Biosimilars Canada launches new campaign to provide sustainable solutions to employers; Celltrion shares positive data for 2 biosimilars.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Can Global Policies to Boost Biosimilar Adoption Work in the US?
November 17th 2024On this special episode of Not So Different honoring Global Biosimilars Week, Craig Burton, executive director of the Biosimilars Council, explores how global policies—from incentives to health equity strategies—could boost biosimilar adoption in the US.
Subcutaneous Infliximab CT-P13 Superior to Placebo as Maintenance Therapy for IBD
November 16th 2024In 2 randomized controlled trials of maintenance therapy for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), the subcutaneous formulation of the infliximab biosimilar CT-P13 demonstrated superiority to placebo in patients with Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis.