Since Novex’s commercial launch, the first national pharmacovigilance plan for a biosimilar monoclonal antibody has been implemented, and data from this post-marketing surveillance show that, in terms of tolerability, this biosimilar has a similar safety profile to that of the reference product.
At the American Society of Hematology’s 59th Annual Meeting and Exposition in Atlanta, Georgia, researcher Gustavo Milone, MD, and his team will present a study that investigates the post-marketing trends of Novex, a biosimilar rituximab that has been approved in Argentina for the same indications as the reference product (MabThera, Rituxan).1 Since Novex’s commercial launch, the first national pharmacovigilance plan for a biosimilar monoclonal antibody has been implemented, and data from this post-marketing surveillance show that, in terms of tolerability, this biosimilar has a similar safety profile to that of the reference product.
In order to determine deviations from expected frequencies of adverse events (AEs), a prospective treatment registry for the biosimilar was implemented from the start of its commercialization on November 26, 2014. Data in the study are reported until June 30, 2017. Physicians, 180 in total, tracked age, gender, indication, dose, dose frequency, and date of treatment initiation and finalization for each patient receiving the biosimilar.
The study comprised the records of 525 patients who had at least 1 follow-up. The majority of patients were female (52%), the mean age was 63.3 years (range, 10-90), and most patients received the biosimilar rituximab for hematological disease (91.2% of cases). The treatment duration ranged from 154 to 309 days, with the number of treatment cycles varying from 1 to 12. Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) were collected from 24 patients with 29 AEs.
The most frequently reported AEs were:
The researchers noted that 41 treatments with rituximab were initiated before the launch of the product; assuming treatment began with MabThera, these 41 treatments imply switching to the biosimilar from the reference.
Researchers investigating data from the post-marketing surveillance found a similar incidence of AEs after the use of rituximab biosimilar when compared to the published data of the reference product. Thus, in terms of tolerability, the biosimilar has a similar safety profile compared with its reference.
Reference
1. Milone G, Penna M, Fernandez F, et al. Post-marketing surveillance with a biosimilar of rituximab (Novex) in Argentina. Presented at the American Society of Hematology 59th Annual Meeting and Exposition 2017, December 9, 2017; Atlanta, Georgia. Abstract 2131. https://ash.confex.com/ash/2017/webprogram/Paper102866.html
Biosimilars Oncology Roundup for June 2024—Podcast Edition
July 7th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review biosimilar news coming out of June, with clinical trial results from conferences and a study showcasing how to overcome economic and noneconomic barriers to oncology biosimilars.
Similar Survival, Safety for Bevacizumab Biosimilar vs Originator in Colorectal Cancer
February 8th 2025A retrospective observational study found no significant differences in progression-free survival or safety in patients with colorectal cancers in Japan treated with ABP 215, Amgen’s bevacizumab biosimilar, or reference bevacizumab (Avastin), and estimated cost savings of 800,000 Japanese yen (approximately $5100) per patient with the biosimilar.
Insights from Festival of Biologics: Dracey Poore Discusses Cardinal Health’s 2024 Biosimilar Report
May 19th 2024The discussion highlights key emerging trends from the Festival of Biologics conference and the annual Cardinal Health Biosimilars Report, including the importance of sustainability in the health care landscape and the challenges and successes in biosimilar adoption and affordability.
The Biosimilar Void: 90% of Biologics Coming Off Patent Will Lack Biosimilars
February 5th 2025Of the 118 biologics losing exclusivity over the next decade, only 10% have biosimilars in development, meaning a vast majority of biologics have no pipeline, which limits savings potential for the health care system.
A Banner Year for Biosimilars: The 19 FDA Approvals From 2024
January 21st 2025In 2024, the FDA approved 19 biosimilars across various therapeutic areas, including the first biosimilars for ustekinumab and denosumab, marking significant progress in expanding treatment options and market competition.
Biosimilars Oncology Roundup for June 2024—Podcast Edition
July 7th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review biosimilar news coming out of June, with clinical trial results from conferences and a study showcasing how to overcome economic and noneconomic barriers to oncology biosimilars.
Similar Survival, Safety for Bevacizumab Biosimilar vs Originator in Colorectal Cancer
February 8th 2025A retrospective observational study found no significant differences in progression-free survival or safety in patients with colorectal cancers in Japan treated with ABP 215, Amgen’s bevacizumab biosimilar, or reference bevacizumab (Avastin), and estimated cost savings of 800,000 Japanese yen (approximately $5100) per patient with the biosimilar.
Insights from Festival of Biologics: Dracey Poore Discusses Cardinal Health’s 2024 Biosimilar Report
May 19th 2024The discussion highlights key emerging trends from the Festival of Biologics conference and the annual Cardinal Health Biosimilars Report, including the importance of sustainability in the health care landscape and the challenges and successes in biosimilar adoption and affordability.
The Biosimilar Void: 90% of Biologics Coming Off Patent Will Lack Biosimilars
February 5th 2025Of the 118 biologics losing exclusivity over the next decade, only 10% have biosimilars in development, meaning a vast majority of biologics have no pipeline, which limits savings potential for the health care system.
A Banner Year for Biosimilars: The 19 FDA Approvals From 2024
January 21st 2025In 2024, the FDA approved 19 biosimilars across various therapeutic areas, including the first biosimilars for ustekinumab and denosumab, marking significant progress in expanding treatment options and market competition.
2 Commerce Drive
Cranbury, NJ 08512