Kashyap Patel, MD: Biosimilars that are currently available in the oncology space—the first one approved was filgrastim; Sandoz was the first one that got approval. Then subsequently one of the products from Pfizer Inc was approved, Nivestym. Prior to that, though, there was a drug called Granix that was approved. Now there are about 3 more biosimilars approved in the therapeutic class as well. One is pegfilgrastim. That of course is supportive care, Udenyca. And then there’s a drug called Fulphila.
Then 2 more drugs approved in the therapy class, which are trastuzumab and the bevacizumab. Both of these drugs are in the regular therapy class approved just in last quarter. With the entry of so many biosimilars in the oncologic therapeutic market, we do expect to have a significant change the way physicians prescribe that. And when we’re looking into the value-based model going forward, these drugs are going to play a tremendous role in helping physicians, patients, providers, and payers.
The efficacy and potency of biosimilars are measured based on the totality of evidence. FDA created a separate path back in 2009 under the BPCIA [Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act], to help incorporate safety, efficacy, and the lack of immunogenicity of the biosimilar. And the FDA created a path called the totality of the evidence evaluation, where multiple points are measured beginning from the structural similarity, to the analytical variance, to the chemical composition, as well as PK/PD [pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic], and immunogenicity. And if the compound with all the totality of factors is identified as very identical to the parent compound, the trial does not have to be done in the clinical space, simply because the FDA has understood the structural similarity as well as other aspects of chemicals. If they are more similar to parent compounds, then there will be no difference in efficacy as well.
For example, the drug called Udenyca was approved based on the totality of evidence, and trial in human volunteers but not in actual patients.
Top 5 Most-Read Oncology Articles of 2024
December 24th 2024The top 5 oncology biosimilar articles in 2024 cover Duke's recommendations for cell and gene therapy biosimilars, FDA approval of Shanghai Henlius Biotech's trastuzumab biosimilar, Boehringer Ingelheim layoffs, the safety of rituximab biosimilar CT-P10, and more.
Biosimilars Oncology Roundup for June 2024—Podcast Edition
July 7th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review biosimilar news coming out of June, with clinical trial results from conferences and a study showcasing how to overcome economic and noneconomic barriers to oncology biosimilars.
Review Confirms Clinical Safety of Sandoz Denosumab Biosimilar vs Originator
December 11th 2024Sandoz's biosimilar denosumab (Jubbonti/Wyost) has demonstrated analytical, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and clinical equivalence to reference denosumab (Prolia/Xgeva), supporting its approval and extrapolation to all approved indications.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
Pertuzumab Biosimilar Shows Promise in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Treatment
December 9th 2024The proposed pertuzumab biosimilar QL1209 demonstrated equivalent efficacy and safety to reference pertuzumab (Perjeta) in neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive, ER/PR-negative early or locally advanced breast cancer, offering a cost-effective alternative with comparable clinical outcomes.
Switching to Rituximab Biosimilars Is Safe, Effective for Patients With Oncohematological Diseases
December 5th 2024Patients with oncohematological diseases switching to rituximab biosimilars experienced similar safety and efficacy, highlighting biosimilars' potential for cost-effective treatment across various medical conditions.