Kashyap Patel, MD: Biosimilars that are currently available in the oncology space—the first one approved was filgrastim; Sandoz was the first one that got approval. Then subsequently one of the products from Pfizer Inc was approved, Nivestym. Prior to that, though, there was a drug called Granix that was approved. Now there are about 3 more biosimilars approved in the therapeutic class as well. One is pegfilgrastim. That of course is supportive care, Udenyca. And then there’s a drug called Fulphila.
Then 2 more drugs approved in the therapy class, which are trastuzumab and the bevacizumab. Both of these drugs are in the regular therapy class approved just in last quarter. With the entry of so many biosimilars in the oncologic therapeutic market, we do expect to have a significant change the way physicians prescribe that. And when we’re looking into the value-based model going forward, these drugs are going to play a tremendous role in helping physicians, patients, providers, and payers.
The efficacy and potency of biosimilars are measured based on the totality of evidence. FDA created a separate path back in 2009 under the BPCIA [Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act], to help incorporate safety, efficacy, and the lack of immunogenicity of the biosimilar. And the FDA created a path called the totality of the evidence evaluation, where multiple points are measured beginning from the structural similarity, to the analytical variance, to the chemical composition, as well as PK/PD [pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic], and immunogenicity. And if the compound with all the totality of factors is identified as very identical to the parent compound, the trial does not have to be done in the clinical space, simply because the FDA has understood the structural similarity as well as other aspects of chemicals. If they are more similar to parent compounds, then there will be no difference in efficacy as well.
For example, the drug called Udenyca was approved based on the totality of evidence, and trial in human volunteers but not in actual patients.
Biosimilars Oncology Roundup for June 2024—Podcast Edition
July 7th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review biosimilar news coming out of June, with clinical trial results from conferences and a study showcasing how to overcome economic and noneconomic barriers to oncology biosimilars.
Biosimilar Approvals Streamlined With Advanced Statistics Amidst Differing Regulatory Requirements
February 25th 2025The FDA and European Medicines Agency (EMA) mandate high similarity between biosimilars and reference products, but their regulatory processes differ, especially with multiple reference products.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
CHMP Pushes 3 Biosimilars Forward, Spelling Hope for Ophthalmology, Supportive Care Markets
February 6th 2025The European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) recommended 3 biosimilars and new indications for reference biologics, moving them closer to final European approval and expanding patient access.
The Biosimilar Void: 90% of Biologics Coming Off Patent Will Lack Biosimilars
February 5th 2025Of the 118 biologics losing exclusivity over the next decade, only 10% have biosimilars in development, meaning a vast majority of biologics have no pipeline, which limits savings potential for the health care system.