Celltrion has announced that it is ready to begin a phase 3 trial of its proposed bevacizumab biosimilar, CT-P16. The multicenter study will begin in Portugal and will eventually include approximately 150 sites in 20 nations in Europe, Asia, and South America.
Celltrion has announced that it is ready to begin a phase 3 trial of its proposed bevacizumab biosimilar, CT-P16. The multicenter study will begin in Portugal and will eventually include approximately 150 sites in 20 nations in Europe, Asia, and South America.
The announcement of the phase 3 trial comes after a June 2018 completion of a phase 1 study in 144 volunteers that evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and immunogenicity of the biosimilar in comparison to both US- and EU-approved reference Avastin.
Bevacizumab is an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) drug that is approved to treat metastatic colorectal cancer, metastatic breast cancer, non—small cell lung cancer, and glioblastoma, but it has also been increasingly used off-label to treat diseases of the eye, including diabetic retinopathy and age-related macular degeneration, because its cost is significantly lower than that of anti-VEGF agents approved to treat eye disorders.
Click here to read more about anti-VEGF drugs.
Currently, 1 bevacizumab biosimilar—Amgen’s Mvasi—is approved in the United States and the European Union, though it has not launched in either territory and continues to be the subject of patent litigation. However, the field of potential biosimilars is growing, with drug makers including TOT Biopharm, JHL Biotech, and Mylan all currently engaged in clinical programs for their own biosimilars.
Celltrion’s announcement of its phase 3 study for CT-P16 follows closely on the heels of its announcement of concurrent phase 1 and phase 3 trials of another molecule, CT-P17, an adalimumab biosimilar referencing Humira. However, news of advancing clinical trials is dampened by ongoing problems with Celltrion’s manufacturing site where it produces its already authorized biosimilars, including its infliximab product, Inflectra.
The Incheon facility in the Republic of Korea recently received its second Form 483 from the FDA in under 1 year, and it has also received an FDA warning letter. While Celltrion called the latest Form 483’s observations “manageable and correctable,” it has not specified a timeline for remediating the issues.
Eye on Pharma: Sandoz Files Antitrust Suit; Yuflyma Interchangeability; Costco’s Ustekinumab Pick
April 22nd 2025Sandoz's antitrust suit against Amgen, the FDA’s interchangeability designation for Celltrion’s adalimumab biosimilar, and the inclusion of an ustekinumab biosimilar in Costco’s prescription program highlight growing momentum to expand biosimilar access and affordability for patients with chronic inflammatory diseases.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Latest Biosimilar Deals Signal Growth Across Immunology, Oncology Markets
April 14th 2025During Q1 2025, pharmaceutical companies accelerated biosimilar expansion through strategic acquisitions and partnerships in hopes of boosting patient access to lower-cost treatments in immunology and oncology.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Risk-Adjusted NPV Framework for Biosimilars Shows Key Investment Drivers
April 7th 2025Early market entry, manufacturing efficiency, and market share are critical to biosimilar development success, while technical complexity and competition heavily impact returns, according to a study presenting a risk-adjusted net present value (NPV) analysis framework.