A recent study evaluated the impact of adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy treatment for patients who were newly diagnosed with ovarian cancer. The results, published in Gynecologic Oncology, found that while the addition of bevacizumab greatly improved progression-free survival (PFS), it did not improve overall survival.
A recent study evaluated the impact of adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy treatment for patients who were newly diagnosed with ovarian cancer. The results, published in Gynecologic Oncology, found that while the addition of bevacizumab greatly improved progression-free survival (PFS), it did not improve overall survival (OS).
The open-label randomized phase 3 ICON7 trial enrolled women with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer that was either high-risk early stage or advanced. Patients were randomized after primary surgery (unless disease was inoperable) to receive 6 cycles of chemotherapy either alone or in combination with bevacizumab at 7.5 mg/kg every 3 weeks for up to 12 months until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point of the trial was PFS and the secondary end point was OS.
In total, the trial enrolled 119 patients with stage I disease, 163 patients with stage II disease, 1034 patients with stage III disease, and 201 patients with stage IV disease. The median duration of follow up was 28 months for PFS and 49 months for OS.
For PFS, the researchers found that all stages indicate better outcomes with the addition of bevacizumab. However, researchers noted that the data found for OS was less clear. This could be due to “the extremely low event rates in the stage I and stage II subgroups compared with the stage III and stage IV.”
Additionally, PFS and OS were also analyzed within the stage IIIB to IV subgroup. The study authors found that, irrespective of residual disease status, all patients in this subgroup derived a PFS benefit from the addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy. Conversely, no OS difference was seen in either the stage IIIB to IV subgroup or the other subgroups classified by the presence or absence of residual disease.
Overall, the addition of bevacizumab to carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy improved PFS in most of the evaluated subgroups. The study found that the main patient populations who appeared not to derive a PFS improvement from the addition of bevacizumab were those with stage I or II disease, though the authors note that this could be due to smaller sample sizes.
Reference
Martin A, Oza A, Embleton A, et al. Exploratory outcome analyses according to stage and/or residual disease in the ICON7 trial of carboplatin and paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab for newly diagnosed ovarian cancer [published online November 15, 2018]. Gyn Oncol. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.08.036.
13 Strategies to Avoid the Nocebo Effect During Biosimilar Switching
December 18th 2024A systematic review identified 13 strategies, including patient and provider education, empathetic communication, and shared decision-making, to mitigate the nocebo effect in biosimilar switching, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach to improve patient perceptions and therapeutic outcomes.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Review Confirms Clinical Safety of Sandoz Denosumab Biosimilar vs Originator
December 11th 2024Sandoz's biosimilar denosumab (Jubbonti/Wyost) has demonstrated analytical, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and clinical equivalence to reference denosumab (Prolia/Xgeva), supporting its approval and extrapolation to all approved indications.
Biosimilars Oncology Roundup for June 2024—Podcast Edition
July 7th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review biosimilar news coming out of June, with clinical trial results from conferences and a study showcasing how to overcome economic and noneconomic barriers to oncology biosimilars.
Pertuzumab Biosimilar Shows Promise in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Treatment
December 9th 2024The proposed pertuzumab biosimilar QL1209 demonstrated equivalent efficacy and safety to reference pertuzumab (Perjeta) in neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive, ER/PR-negative early or locally advanced breast cancer, offering a cost-effective alternative with comparable clinical outcomes.
Switching to Rituximab Biosimilars Is Safe, Effective for Patients With Oncohematological Diseases
December 5th 2024Patients with oncohematological diseases switching to rituximab biosimilars experienced similar safety and efficacy, highlighting biosimilars' potential for cost-effective treatment across various medical conditions.