The findings indicate that interventions that leverage physician relationships may assist with increasing uptake of new, high-value cancer treatments in place of low-value therapies.
A study published Friday in JAMA Network Open found that peer influence factored heavily into whether oncologists decided to eventually adopt bevacizumab for their patients.
The findings indicate that interventions that leverage physician relationships may assist with increasing uptake of new, high-value cancer treatments in place of low-value therapies, the authors said.
The study took place at the time when only the reference product, Avastin, was available. The first biosimilar bevacizumab, Mvasi, became available in the United States in 2017.
Researchers examined adoption of bevacizumab in 2007 to 2010 among oncologists who had not prescribed the drug in 2005 to 2006.
These oncologists who were associated with fellow oncologists who did use bevacizumab in those years had increased use of the drug in 2007 to 2010.
The cohort study took place in 51 randomly selected hospital referral regions in the United States. Participants were 44,012 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older with cancers of the colorectum, lung, breast, kidney, brain, or ovary treated by 3261 oncologists in 2005 to 2010.
Data were analyzed in 2017 to 2018.
Among patients treated with chemotherapy during 2007 to 2010 by an oncologist who had not treated patients with the biologic in 2005 to 2006, models (adjusted for patient and physician characteristics and physician, practice, and community random effects) assessed the association of bevacizumab use with rates of use among connected physicians in 2005 to 2006. Of the 44,012, 34,750 patients were treated with chemotherapy in 2005 to 2006 in the 51 hospital referral regions.
Among 9262 patients treated in 2007 to 2010 by 829 physicians whose patients did not use bevacizumab in 2005 to 2006, 3654 (39.5%) were aged 75 years or older and 6227 (67.2%) were female.
The rate of bevacizumab use relative to other chemotherapy in 2007 to 2010 by tertile of use among their physician’s peers in 2005 to 2006 was 10.0%, 9.5%, and 13.6%, respectively. For all patients receiving chemotherapy, the receipt of bevacizumab was less than 4.4%, 4.4% to 6.2%, and more than 6.2%, respectively.
After adjustment, use of bevacizumab in 2007 to 2010 was greater among physicians in communities with the highest rates of bevacizumab use in 2005 to 2006 compared with those whose peers were in the lowest tertile of bevacizumab use in 2005 to 2006 (adjusted odds ratio, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.20-2.25).
13 Strategies to Avoid the Nocebo Effect During Biosimilar Switching
December 18th 2024A systematic review identified 13 strategies, including patient and provider education, empathetic communication, and shared decision-making, to mitigate the nocebo effect in biosimilar switching, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach to improve patient perceptions and therapeutic outcomes.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Review Confirms Clinical Safety of Sandoz Denosumab Biosimilar vs Originator
December 11th 2024Sandoz's biosimilar denosumab (Jubbonti/Wyost) has demonstrated analytical, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and clinical equivalence to reference denosumab (Prolia/Xgeva), supporting its approval and extrapolation to all approved indications.
Biosimilars Oncology Roundup for June 2024—Podcast Edition
July 7th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review biosimilar news coming out of June, with clinical trial results from conferences and a study showcasing how to overcome economic and noneconomic barriers to oncology biosimilars.
Pertuzumab Biosimilar Shows Promise in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Treatment
December 9th 2024The proposed pertuzumab biosimilar QL1209 demonstrated equivalent efficacy and safety to reference pertuzumab (Perjeta) in neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive, ER/PR-negative early or locally advanced breast cancer, offering a cost-effective alternative with comparable clinical outcomes.
Switching to Rituximab Biosimilars Is Safe, Effective for Patients With Oncohematological Diseases
December 5th 2024Patients with oncohematological diseases switching to rituximab biosimilars experienced similar safety and efficacy, highlighting biosimilars' potential for cost-effective treatment across various medical conditions.