Legislators on Capitol Hill are moving forward this month with bills that address patent issues pertaining to biosimilars.
Legislators on Capitol Hill are moving forward this month with bills that address patent issues pertaining to biosimilars.
Earlier this month, Representatives Hakeem Jeffries, D-New York, and Doug Collins, R-Georgia, introduced the bipartisan Terminating the Extension of Rights Misappropriated (TERM) Act of 2019. The bills would limit patent evergreening, a tactic whereby drug companies make minor changes to a drug and file for a new patent on those small changes in order to extend their exclusivity and, in turn, charge more costly prices.
Under existing patent law, generic drug manufacturers must prove why a new patent should not be granted on an existing medication. The TERM Act shifts that burden of proof to pharmaceutical companies, who would have to demonstrate “distinct inventions” in order qualify a changed drug for a new patent.
In addition, the bill directs the director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office to send a report to the Judiciary committee in the House of Representatives a year after the bill becomes law. The report would contain a review and recommendations regarding best examination practices, guidance, and procedures to avoid patent evergreening.
“The bipartisan TERM Act will curb patent abuses in order to expedite the entrance of lower cost generic drugs to market,” Jeffries said in a statement.
“Competition in the pharmaceutical market decreases costs and increases options for patients. Pharmaceutical companies are great innovators that create life-saving cures and treatments for families everywhere. Unfortunately, some manufacturers simply file additional patents in order to delay generic drugs from coming to market,” Collins added.
The bill is co-sponsored by Representatives Debbie Mucarsel-Powell, D-Florida, and Ben Cline, R-Virginia.
On the Senate side, Lamar Alexander, R-Tennessee, and Patty Murray, D-Washington, recently introduced S 1895, the Lower Health Care Costs Act of 2019, which includes biosimilars’ role in reducing the prices of prescription drugs. Alexander is chairman and Murray is ranking member of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, which will vote on the bill on June 26.
One part of the legislation would require updates to the FDA’s Purple Book, which provides stakeholders with information on biologics. The legislation would codify the Purple Book as a single, searchable list of information that would include, among other information, materials related to patents on biologics.
Alexander’s committee has held 5 hearings on ways to reduce healthcare costs and 4 hearings on the cost of prescription drugs. The bill is made up of nearly 3 dozen discrete provisions from at least 16 Republican and 14 Democrat lawmakers.
Besides addressing certain aspects of prescription drug prices, the bill also seeks to end surprise medical bills, increase transparency in healthcare, improve public health, and improve the exchange of health information.
Another recently introduced Senate bill would give the Federal Trade Commission the authority to bring antitrust suits against pharmaceutical companies for blocking competition through the use of the patent system.
Empowering Vulnerable Populations: The Path to Equitable Biologic Therapy Access
December 22nd 2024Elie Bahou, PharmD, senior vice president and system chief pharmacy officer at Providence, discusses strategies to improve equitable access to biologic therapies, including tiered formularies, income-based cost sharing, patient assistance programs, and fostering payer partnerships.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
BioRationality: Withdrawal of Proposed Terminal Disclaimer Rule Spells Major Setback for Biosimilars
December 10th 2024The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)’s withdrawal of its proposed terminal disclaimer rule is seen as a setback for biosimilar developers, as it preserves patent prosecution practices that favor originator companies and increases costs for biosimilar competition, according to Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD.
Perceptions of Biosimilar Switching Among Veterans With IBD
December 2nd 2024Veterans with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) prioritize shared decision-making, transparency, and individualized care in biosimilar switching, favoring delayed switching for severe cases and greater patient control.
The Rebate War: How Originator Companies Are Fighting Back Against Biosimilars
November 25th 2024Few biologics in the US have multiple biosimilar competitors, but originator biologics respond quickly to competition by increasing rebates and lowering net prices, despite short approval-to-launch timelines for biosimilars.