BCD-021 demonstrated equivalence in a phase 3 study involving Russian and Indian patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
A phase 3 study of the bevacizumab biosimilar BCD-021 vs reference bevacizumab (Avastin) in patients with stage IIIB or IV nonsquamous non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) demonstrated equivalence, investigators reported at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Congress 2021.
Investigators sought to elucidate the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and immunogenicity of BCD-021 compared with reference bevacizumab.
BCD-021 was approved as a biosimilar in November 2015 by the Russian Ministry of Health. The drug was developed by Russian biotechnology company Biocad. The originator was developed by Genentech and Roche.
Patients (n = 357) from Russia and India were randomized 1:1 and 2:1, respectively, to either biosimilar or reference bevacizumab plus paclitaxel and carboplatin once every 3 weeks for 6 cycles. At week 18, patients with stable disease or complete or partial response (CR/PR) were offered the opportunity to continue with BCD-021 until disease progression, death, or intolerable toxicity.
The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) as measured by response at week 19 and confirmed 4 weeks later. The primary PK end point was variation of drug concentration, as measured by Ctrough, or predose drug concentration, and Cmax, or peak concentration following dosing.
Additional end points were safety and immunogenicity.
Investigators said the treated population measured 341 patients (BCD-021, n = 205; BEV, n = 136). Confirmed ORRs were observed in 34.6% of the biosimilar cohort (n = 71) and 33.8% of the reference population (n = 46). The respective confirmed percentages for CR were 1.5% and 0.7%; and PR, 33.2% and 33.1%.
Patients experiencing stable disease in the biosimilar and reference groups were 31.7% and 33.8%, respectively. The proportions experiencing progressive disease were 13.2% and 11.0%, respectively.
Investigators said criteria were met for PK equivalence in both the Indian and non-Indian populations.
Patients experiencing any adverse event (AE) were 91.3% in the biosimilar group vs 93.4% in the originator cohort; serious AEs were 13.6% vs 10.9%, respectively; and treatment-related serious AEs were 3.4% vs 2.2%.
Patients discontinuing due to AEs were 4 and 2 in the biosimilar and reference groups, respectively; and deaths were 14 and 8, respectively.
The most frequent AEs were anemia, neutropenia, and alopecia.
“This study demonstrated equivalence between BCD-021 and (Avastin) in terms of ORR risk difference and risk ratio. PK equivalence of BCD-021 and [Avastin] was also confirmed. Safety and immunogenicity parameters were comparable” between the biosimilar and reference agents, investigators concluded.
Reference
Fadeeva N, Roy B, Nagarkar R, et al. A phase III study comparing BCD-021, a bevacizumab biosimilar, and reference bevacizumab in patients with stage IIIB or IV non-squamous NSCLC. Presented at: ESMO Congress 2021; September 16-21, 2021. ePoster 1338P.
13 Strategies to Avoid the Nocebo Effect During Biosimilar Switching
December 18th 2024A systematic review identified 13 strategies, including patient and provider education, empathetic communication, and shared decision-making, to mitigate the nocebo effect in biosimilar switching, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach to improve patient perceptions and therapeutic outcomes.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Review Confirms Clinical Safety of Sandoz Denosumab Biosimilar vs Originator
December 11th 2024Sandoz's biosimilar denosumab (Jubbonti/Wyost) has demonstrated analytical, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and clinical equivalence to reference denosumab (Prolia/Xgeva), supporting its approval and extrapolation to all approved indications.
Eye on Pharma: Golimumab Biosimilar Update; Korea Approves Denosumab; Xbrane, Intas Collaboration
December 10th 2024Alvotech and Advanz Pharma have submitted a European marketing application for their golimumab biosimilar to treat inflammatory diseases, while Celltrion secured Korean approval for denosumab biosimilars, and Intas Pharmaceuticals partnered with Xbrane Biopharma on a nivolumab biosimilar.
Pertuzumab Biosimilar Shows Promise in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Treatment
December 9th 2024The proposed pertuzumab biosimilar QL1209 demonstrated equivalent efficacy and safety to reference pertuzumab (Perjeta) in neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive, ER/PR-negative early or locally advanced breast cancer, offering a cost-effective alternative with comparable clinical outcomes.