BCD-021 demonstrated equivalence in a phase 3 study involving Russian and Indian patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
A phase 3 study of the bevacizumab biosimilar BCD-021 vs reference bevacizumab (Avastin) in patients with stage IIIB or IV nonsquamous non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) demonstrated equivalence, investigators reported at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Congress 2021.
Investigators sought to elucidate the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and immunogenicity of BCD-021 compared with reference bevacizumab.
BCD-021 was approved as a biosimilar in November 2015 by the Russian Ministry of Health. The drug was developed by Russian biotechnology company Biocad. The originator was developed by Genentech and Roche.
Patients (n = 357) from Russia and India were randomized 1:1 and 2:1, respectively, to either biosimilar or reference bevacizumab plus paclitaxel and carboplatin once every 3 weeks for 6 cycles. At week 18, patients with stable disease or complete or partial response (CR/PR) were offered the opportunity to continue with BCD-021 until disease progression, death, or intolerable toxicity.
The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) as measured by response at week 19 and confirmed 4 weeks later. The primary PK end point was variation of drug concentration, as measured by Ctrough, or predose drug concentration, and Cmax, or peak concentration following dosing.
Additional end points were safety and immunogenicity.
Investigators said the treated population measured 341 patients (BCD-021, n = 205; BEV, n = 136). Confirmed ORRs were observed in 34.6% of the biosimilar cohort (n = 71) and 33.8% of the reference population (n = 46). The respective confirmed percentages for CR were 1.5% and 0.7%; and PR, 33.2% and 33.1%.
Patients experiencing stable disease in the biosimilar and reference groups were 31.7% and 33.8%, respectively. The proportions experiencing progressive disease were 13.2% and 11.0%, respectively.
Investigators said criteria were met for PK equivalence in both the Indian and non-Indian populations.
Patients experiencing any adverse event (AE) were 91.3% in the biosimilar group vs 93.4% in the originator cohort; serious AEs were 13.6% vs 10.9%, respectively; and treatment-related serious AEs were 3.4% vs 2.2%.
Patients discontinuing due to AEs were 4 and 2 in the biosimilar and reference groups, respectively; and deaths were 14 and 8, respectively.
The most frequent AEs were anemia, neutropenia, and alopecia.
“This study demonstrated equivalence between BCD-021 and (Avastin) in terms of ORR risk difference and risk ratio. PK equivalence of BCD-021 and [Avastin] was also confirmed. Safety and immunogenicity parameters were comparable” between the biosimilar and reference agents, investigators concluded.
Reference
Fadeeva N, Roy B, Nagarkar R, et al. A phase III study comparing BCD-021, a bevacizumab biosimilar, and reference bevacizumab in patients with stage IIIB or IV non-squamous NSCLC. Presented at: ESMO Congress 2021; September 16-21, 2021. ePoster 1338P.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Similar Survival, Safety for Bevacizumab Biosimilar vs Originator in Colorectal Cancer
February 8th 2025A retrospective observational study found no significant differences in progression-free survival or safety in patients with colorectal cancers in Japan treated with ABP 215, Amgen’s bevacizumab biosimilar, or reference bevacizumab (Avastin), and estimated cost savings of 800,000 Japanese yen (approximately $5100) per patient with the biosimilar.
The Biosimilar Void: 90% of Biologics Coming Off Patent Will Lack Biosimilars
February 5th 2025Of the 118 biologics losing exclusivity over the next decade, only 10% have biosimilars in development, meaning a vast majority of biologics have no pipeline, which limits savings potential for the health care system.
The Banking of Biosimilars: Insights From a Leading Health Economist
February 4th 2025Biosimilars have the potential to reduce health care costs and expand patient access, but economic and policy barriers affect adoption, explored James D. Chambers, PhD, MPharm, MSc, associate professor at the Tufts Medical Center Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, in an interview.