A consensus statement developed by the Pan American League of Associations for Rheumatology (PANLAR) regarding biosimilars warned against the use of so-called "biomimics," or copy biologics.
A consensus statement developed by the Pan American League of Associations for Rheumatology (PANLAR) regarding biosimilars warned against the use of so-called biomimics, or copy biologics.
These products are local copies of approved biologic drugs that received approval without adhering to the international standards for evaluation and approval of biosimilars; the statement said such copies of etanercept and rituximab are available in some Asian and Latin American countries.
If these copies are to be sold, the statement said, they must first be evaluated and approved by a regulatory agency according to guidelines developed by the World Health Organization for new biologics and biosimilars.
The statement was developed through a literature review and a consensus was reached when there was agreement among 80% or more of the panel members. The review included 108 articles, which were classified into the following topics: extrapolation of indications, safety, regulation, interchangeability, pharmacovigilance, immunogenicity, and pharmacoeconomic.
Besides the warning about biomimics, the statement noted the following:
However, no consensus was achieved regarding extrapolation of indications, or about automatic substitution at the pharmacy counter without the permission of the provider.
Among the questions that must be settled, the statement said, are what would be required to designate a drug as interchangeable and how many switches between reference products and biosimilars would be needed in a clinical trial.
Reference
Kowalski, SC, Benavides, JA, Roa, PAB et al. PANLAR Consensus Statement on Biosimilars. Clin Rheumatol. 2019;38(5):1485-1496. doi: 10.1007/s10067-019-04496-3.
13 Strategies to Avoid the Nocebo Effect During Biosimilar Switching
December 18th 2024A systematic review identified 13 strategies, including patient and provider education, empathetic communication, and shared decision-making, to mitigate the nocebo effect in biosimilar switching, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach to improve patient perceptions and therapeutic outcomes.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
BioRationality: Withdrawal of Proposed Terminal Disclaimer Rule Spells Major Setback for Biosimilars
December 10th 2024The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)’s withdrawal of its proposed terminal disclaimer rule is seen as a setback for biosimilar developers, as it preserves patent prosecution practices that favor originator companies and increases costs for biosimilar competition, according to Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD.
Perceptions of Biosimilar Switching Among Veterans With IBD
December 2nd 2024Veterans with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) prioritize shared decision-making, transparency, and individualized care in biosimilar switching, favoring delayed switching for severe cases and greater patient control.
The Rebate War: How Originator Companies Are Fighting Back Against Biosimilars
November 25th 2024Few biologics in the US have multiple biosimilar competitors, but originator biologics respond quickly to competition by increasing rebates and lowering net prices, despite short approval-to-launch timelines for biosimilars.