Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, outlines how President Joe Biden's new budget for 2025 could impact biosimilars, including provisions to clear up confusion surrounding interchangeable products.
The FY 2025 US budget announced on March 11 is one of the rare admissions of why the cost of pharmaceuticals per capita is the highest globally. The FY 2025 budget includes several legislative proposals supporting the FDA's efforts to protect American consumers and patients. Of the dozens of proposals, the significant ones for the generic industry are:
The extension of the ingredient listing requirement of parenteral products to chemical drugs.
Amending certain exclusivity provisions for drugs to encourage meaningful innovation and timely competition. FDA is seeking to encourage competition for new drugs by proposing to amend the Hatch-Waxman 3-year exclusivity provisions to ensure that this exclusivity is limited to situations where the new drug applicant is seeking such exclusivity and where the data supporting the exclusivity demonstrates the hypothesized effect of the drug and to prevent information on new safety risks from blocking competition. This approach would continue to reward innovation while allowing earlier access to generic drugs in certain situations.
However, the most relevant suggestion is to eliminate the statutory distinction between the approval standard for biosimilar and interchangeable biosimilar products and deem approved biosimilars interchangeable. The statutory distinction between biosimilars and interchangeable biosimilars has led to confusion and misunderstanding among patients and health care providers about the safety and effectiveness of biosimilars and whether interchangeable biosimilars are safer or more effective than other biosimilars. This proposal would make the US biosimilar program more consistent with current scientific understanding and the approach adopted by other major regulatory jurisdictions, such as the European Union, where biosimilars are interchangeable with their respective reference products upon approval. Further, this proposal is expected to increase the uptake of biosimilars, with potential downstream effects of increasing competition, access, and affordability.
However, the FDA is taking a different approach when FDA Commissioner Robert Califf, MD, said approval from Congress is still the best pathway to making the change than just declaring biosimilars interchangeable; the FDA is seeking to amend section 351 of the Public Health Service Act to no longer include a separate statutory standard for a determination of interchangeability and to deem all approved biosimilars to be interchangeable with their respective reference products. This is a wrong decision by the FDA, since such legislative changes are difficult to achieve, and often get tossed out due to many conflicts of interest. Notably, the US Senate has a bill pending to do just that, and I have provided support through my publications and meetings with senators, but it is going nowhere. Before the release of the FY 2025 budget, I was consulted by the White House, and I was able to present a solid scientific argument, avoiding cost savings as the primary reason. I am glad to see this provision in the budget, but I am not sure if the FDA fully supports it and instead waits for the amendment to 351(k), and indeed, the big pharma has already launched a campaign to prevent this from happening.
13 Strategies to Avoid the Nocebo Effect During Biosimilar Switching
December 18th 2024A systematic review identified 13 strategies, including patient and provider education, empathetic communication, and shared decision-making, to mitigate the nocebo effect in biosimilar switching, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach to improve patient perceptions and therapeutic outcomes.
Biosimilars Development Roundup for October 2024—Podcast Edition
November 3rd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the GRx+Biosims conference, which included discussions on data transparency, artificial intelligence (AI), and collaboration to enhance the global supply chain for biosimilars and generic drugs, as well as the evolving requirements for biosimilar devices.
Eye on Pharma: Golimumab Biosimilar Update; Korea Approves Denosumab; Xbrane, Intas Collaboration
December 10th 2024Alvotech and Advanz Pharma have submitted a European marketing application for their golimumab biosimilar to treat inflammatory diseases, while Celltrion secured Korean approval for denosumab biosimilars, and Intas Pharmaceuticals partnered with Xbrane Biopharma on a nivolumab biosimilar.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Commercial Payer Coverage of Biosimilars: Market Share, Pricing, and Policy Shifts
December 4th 2024Researchers observe significant shifts in payer preferences for originator vs biosimilar products from 2017 to 2022, revealing growing payer interest in multiple product options, alongside the increasing market share of biosimilars, which contributed to notable reductions in both average sales prices and wholesale acquisition costs.
Perceptions of Biosimilar Switching Among Veterans With IBD
December 2nd 2024Veterans with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) prioritize shared decision-making, transparency, and individualized care in biosimilar switching, favoring delayed switching for severe cases and greater patient control.