The promise of biosimilars is that these subsequent-entry products can reduce the cost of biologic therapy by offering lower-priced alternatives that do not compromise efficacy or safety. An additional benefit is that the presence of competition in the marketplace can also drive down costs for originator products, or at least curb price growth, though to what degree biosimilars have had such an impact on originator biologics in the US market has not been fully elucidated.
The promise of biosimilars is that these subsequent-entry products can reduce the cost of biologic therapy by offering lower-priced alternatives that do not compromise efficacy or safety. An additional benefit is that the presence of competition in the marketplace can also drive down costs for originator products, or at least curb price growth, though to what degree biosimilars have had such an impact on originator biologics in the US market has not been fully elucidated.
In a new research letter appearing this month in JAMA Network Open, a team of researchers from the University of Pittsburgh and the UPMC Health Plan reported on their assessment of how biosimilar availability has impacted prices for reference products.
Using pricing data from January 2007 to June 2018 from SSR Health, the researchers examined prices for filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, and infliximab (which face biosimilar competition), as well as insulin glargine (which has a follow-on insulin available). For each year, they calculated the mean list and net prices and mean discounts for Medicaid and other payers for the drugs in question.
They found the following:
While the study was subject to limitations—including the fact that estimates of Medicaid discounts reflect only statutory rebates and the fact that it is not possible to determine whether large discounts are a result of increases in rebates or other manufacturer concessions—the authors write that, for all 4 products, availability of biosimilars or follow-ons accelerated decreases in net prices for biologics.
“Our findings show that biologics that faced biosimilar competition—even without interchangeability—showed marked reductions in net prices and leveling off of list price increases,” write the authors.
Reference
San-Juan-Rodriguez A, Gellad F, Good CB, Hernandez I. Trends in list prices, net prices, and discounts for originator biologics facing biosimilar competition. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(12): e1917379. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.17379.
Eye on Pharma: Sandoz Files Antitrust Suit; Yuflyma Interchangeability; Costco’s Ustekinumab Pick
April 22nd 2025Sandoz's antitrust suit against Amgen, the FDA’s interchangeability designation for Celltrion’s adalimumab biosimilar, and the inclusion of an ustekinumab biosimilar in Costco’s prescription program highlight growing momentum to expand biosimilar access and affordability for patients with chronic inflammatory diseases.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Latest Biosimilar Deals Signal Growth Across Immunology, Oncology Markets
April 14th 2025During Q1 2025, pharmaceutical companies accelerated biosimilar expansion through strategic acquisitions and partnerships in hopes of boosting patient access to lower-cost treatments in immunology and oncology.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Risk-Adjusted NPV Framework for Biosimilars Shows Key Investment Drivers
April 7th 2025Early market entry, manufacturing efficiency, and market share are critical to biosimilar development success, while technical complexity and competition heavily impact returns, according to a study presenting a risk-adjusted net present value (NPV) analysis framework.