In November, the Supreme Court heard arguments on the Affordable Care Act, Europe fired up its efforts to create a more biosimilar-friendly environment, and Genentech fought to protect its bevacizumab franchise.
As the fate of the US biosimilar pathway was deliberated by the Supreme Court, experts weighed in throughout the month on what could be done to improve biosimilar access and uptake.
ACA Challenged in the Supreme Court
On November 10, the Supreme Court heard arguments on whether the individual mandate is severable from the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Caught in the middle of this argument is the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA), which outlines the regulatory pathway for biosimilars and is part of the ACA. The individual mandate, which was found to be unconstitutional, dictates that individuals must have health insurance or pay a penalty.
Chief Justice John Roberts, along with several associate justices, hinted that the ACA and BPCIA could be saved if the mandate is deemed severable, saying, “It’s hard for you to argue that Congress intended the entire act to fall if the mandate was struck down,” and that “there seems to be compelling evidence” that the intent of Congress was for the “rest of the law to survive if an unconstitutional provision were severed.”
In an expert column for The Center for Biosimilars®, 2 intellectual property attorneys offered their opinion on the oral arguments, stating that although a ruling for severability is likely, “It is not unheard of” for justices to do something unexpected.
The Future of Biosimilar Legislation
Molly Burich, MS, associate director for Public Policy at Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, takes a cautious view of the potential for robust improvements in biosimilar access in the near future, but she offered a nugget of hope at the Association for Accessible Medicines GRx+Biosims 2020 conference, saying that current legislative efforts to boost biosimilar adoption have strong bipartisan support.
Burich examined 6 bills that have been introduced in the House of Representatives. These include bills that would eliminate patient cost sharing for biosimilars under Medicare Part B, increase incentives for providers to prescribe biosimilars, make patent information more accessible to developers, and increase biosimilar education efforts.
Biosimilar Cases to Watch: Prolia/Xgeva and Denosumab Competitors
March 11th 2025The denosumab biosimilar market is poised for disruption with 3 FDA-approved biosimilars, at least 5 awaiting approval, and launches anticipated to start in May 2025, while ongoing patent litigation continues to shape the competitive landscape.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
From Amjevita to Zarxio: A Decade of US Biosimilar Approvals
March 6th 2025Since the FDA’s groundbreaking approval of Zarxio in 2015, the US biosimilars market has surged to 67 approvals across 18 originators—though the journey has been anything but smooth, with adoption facing hurdles along the way.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.