A study found that switching from rituximab to biosimilar CT-P10 is safe and effective for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).
Switching from originator rituximab to biosimilar rituximab (CT-P10) was found to be safe and effective in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), according to a study published in the European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences.1
SLE can be defined as an autoimmune disease where the body attacks healthy tissue, impacting the skin, joints, kidneys, brain, and other organs.2 Epidemiology of SLE is not quite clear but evidence suggests the condition is associated with genetics, environmental factors, hormones, and medications. Symptoms of SLE can vary widely, but often include joint pain, fatigue, skin rashes, and fever.
Treatment for SLE ranges but widespread evidence has found decreased B-cell counts result in positive effects through the induction of T cells that leads to the production of cytokines.1 The originator rituximab was developed to induce apoptosis of B cells by killing B cells mediated by complement and antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity by antagonizing CD20.
Celltrion developed the first rituximab biosimilar, and it received approval in 2017 by the European Medicines Agency (EMA).3 The drug was originally made to treat non-Hodgkin lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, rheumatoid arthritis, and granulomatosis with polyangiitis. This was the first biosimilar to receive market approval from the EMA and its usage approval is available for all indications of originator rituximab.1
“The objective of our study was to analyze the efficacy and safety data of treatments with originator rituximab and CT-P10 molecules intra-comparatively,” the study authors stated.
Disease activity was assessed with the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K). SLEDAI-2K is a weighted scoring system that accounts for various clinical and laboratory factors associated with SLE to assess disease activity.
Most patients were female (86.4%), and they had a mean (SD) age of 40.3 (10.6) years. Treatment duration was 35.6 (23.0) months for the originator and 17 months for CT-P10. More than half of the patient population had at least 1 comorbidity present (68.2%), the most common being hypertension (63.6%).
The kidney was considered the most frequently involved organ (63.6%), and ischemic cerebrovascular accident was the most common neurological involvement pattern (22.7%).
SLEDAI-2K scores were 2 and 0, respectively, approximately 3 months before and after the administration of the first dose of biosimilar CT-P10. The SLEDAI-2K scores of the rituximab biosimilar represented a statistically significant difference (P = .027). Three months after the first dose of CT-P10, the SLEDAI-2K score was significantly lower. The analysis identified differences between the SLEDAI-2K score 3 months after the last dose of the originator (median, 2.5) and the score found in patients around 3 months after the first dose of the biosimilar (median, 0.0) (P = .011).
The rituximab originator had an adverse effect frequency during administration of 15.3 per 100 patient-years. Urinary tract infections were of the most common infections contracted (7.7 per 100 patient-years).
During administration of the biosimilar, the adverse effect frequency was 39 per 100 patient-years. Pneumonia was the most common infection among patients, at 19.5 per 100 patient-years.
The limited number of participants and study design limited the results. The duration of follow-up after switching to the biosimilar was shorter than the originator. The study also did not include a control group, and most patients were not in flare during the efficacy evaluation. The COVID-19 pandemic coincided with the time interval of switching.
References
Breaking Barriers in Osteoporosis Care: New Denosumab Biosimilars Wyost, Jubbonti Approved
June 16th 2024In this episode, The Center for Biosimilars® delves into the FDA approval of the first denosumab biosimilars, Wyost and Jubbonti (denosumab-bbdz), and discuss their potential to revolutionize osteoporosis treatment with expert insights from 2 rheumatologists.
Eye on Pharma: Golimumab Biosimilar Update; Korea Approves Denosumab; Xbrane, Intas Collaboration
December 10th 2024Alvotech and Advanz Pharma have submitted a European marketing application for their golimumab biosimilar to treat inflammatory diseases, while Celltrion secured Korean approval for denosumab biosimilars, and Intas Pharmaceuticals partnered with Xbrane Biopharma on a nivolumab biosimilar.
Insights from Festival of Biologics: Dracey Poore Discusses Cardinal Health’s 2024 Biosimilar Report
May 19th 2024The discussion highlights key emerging trends from the Festival of Biologics conference and the annual Cardinal Health Biosimilars Report, including the importance of sustainability in the health care landscape and the challenges and successes in biosimilar adoption and affordability.
Cost and Efficacy Insights on Infliximab Biosimilars in Pediatric Uveitis
December 3rd 2024The study highlights the safety, efficacy, and cost benefits of infliximab biosimilars in managing pediatric noninfectious uveitis, showing fewer disease flares and reduced costs compared with reference infliximab, as well as the influence of insurance mandates on treatment decisions.
Perceptions of Biosimilar Switching Among Veterans With IBD
December 2nd 2024Veterans with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) prioritize shared decision-making, transparency, and individualized care in biosimilar switching, favoring delayed switching for severe cases and greater patient control.