“This is a crucial moment for the growth of biosimilars in the United States, and we are encouraged that HHS is committed to pursuing policies that reward innovation and support provider and patient access and choice,” said Juliana M. Reed, president of the Biosimilars Forum.
Yesterday, the Biosimilars Forum submitted formal comments to HHS Secretary Alex Azar on the administration’s blueprint to lower drug prices and reduce out-of-pocket costs for patients.
In a statement provided to The Center for Biosimilars®, The Biosimilars Forum summarized its comments on the blueprint in 4 areas: increasing competition, supporting better negotiation, creating incentives to lower list prices of drugs, and reducing patient out-of-pocket spending.
In terms of increasing competition, the Forum supports the FDA’s efforts to make the development, review, and approval of biosimilars more efficient, and says that that increased flexibility in the FDA’s expectations, while maintaining scientific rigor, may improve efficiency. Due to the Agency’s recent withdrawal of the draft guidance document titled “Statistical Approaches to Evaluate Analytical Similarity,” “The Forum urges FDA to inject increased flexibility into a revised draft guidance while maintaining high standards to ensure patient safety.”
In order to promote better negotiation, the Forum also raised concerns about the administration’s intention to revive the Competitive Acquisition Program (CAP) for Medicare Part B drugs as an alternative to the current average sales price process. The Forum believes that CAP may create an unnecessary inconvenience for certain patients, such as oncology patients, due to the inventory for treatment potentially not being on hand.
Additionally, the Forum noted concerns about the possibility of shifting drugs currently covered under Part B to coverage under Part D because of the potential to increase costs for patients as well as create a number of issues with delivery, the supply chain, and access to care.
In keeping with the administration’s effort to provide incentives for companies to lower the list prices of drugs, the Forum recommends that CMS develop a biosimilar dashboard, similar to its Drug Spending Dashboard, to help stakeholders better understand trends in market uptake.
Finally, last year, CMS initially proposed to include biosimilars in the definition of generic drugs, but did not move forward with this proposed change. The Forum voiced support for CMS’ recognition that biosimilars are not generics and urged the administration to continue to treat biosimilars as innovative products that provide a cost savings to biologics, for which previous “generic pricing policies” were not applicable.
The Forum further urges the administration to build off of prior policy advances to lower prescription drug costs and patient spending by continuing to promote the biosimilars market. “This is a crucial moment for the growth of biosimilars in the United States, and we are encouraged that HHS is committed to pursuing policies that reward innovation and support provider and patient access and choice,” said Juliana M. Reed, president of the Biosimilars Forum.
13 Strategies to Avoid the Nocebo Effect During Biosimilar Switching
December 18th 2024A systematic review identified 13 strategies, including patient and provider education, empathetic communication, and shared decision-making, to mitigate the nocebo effect in biosimilar switching, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach to improve patient perceptions and therapeutic outcomes.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Eye on Pharma: Golimumab Biosimilar Update; Korea Approves Denosumab; Xbrane, Intas Collaboration
December 10th 2024Alvotech and Advanz Pharma have submitted a European marketing application for their golimumab biosimilar to treat inflammatory diseases, while Celltrion secured Korean approval for denosumab biosimilars, and Intas Pharmaceuticals partnered with Xbrane Biopharma on a nivolumab biosimilar.
Perceptions of Biosimilar Switching Among Veterans With IBD
December 2nd 2024Veterans with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) prioritize shared decision-making, transparency, and individualized care in biosimilar switching, favoring delayed switching for severe cases and greater patient control.
The Rebate War: How Originator Companies Are Fighting Back Against Biosimilars
November 25th 2024Few biologics in the US have multiple biosimilar competitors, but originator biologics respond quickly to competition by increasing rebates and lowering net prices, despite short approval-to-launch timelines for biosimilars.