Ivo Abraham, PhD, RN, University of Arizona Cancer Center, focused on the cost savings generated by biosimilars and how crucial reinvesting those savings into broader patient access to care is. This approach has the potential to improve health care equity and expand treatment options for patients.
Ivo Abraham, PhD, RN, director of the Center for Health Outcomes and PharmacoEconomic Research at the University of Arizona Cancer Center examined the integration of clinical practice and health economics research to expedite biosimilar access, in an interview with The Center for Biosimilars®.
Abraham highlights the established safety and efficacy of reference drugs, arguing that rigorous cost-effectiveness studies for biosimilars may not be necessary.
This transcript has been lightly edited for clarity.
Transcript
How can the integration of both clinical practices and health economics research fall into the biosimilar development process to expedite access for patients while maintaining rigorous scientific evaluation?
The critical part here is really the fundamentals now of biosimilars come in and that's the economics. People say "yes, but don't we need cost effectiveness studies on biosimilars?" Well, if we know that another drug, your reference drug, has a certain level of cost effectiveness, clinical and safety outcomes relative to cost, we don't need to replicate an analysis like that because we know that statistically, our biosimilar product has equivalent margins in safety and effectiveness.
What we need to focus on here is if we have a biosimilar, relative to a reference product, and there is a price differential, it's no rocket science, you're going to have savings efficiencies.
That's where most payers really stop, although some of them have begun to listen to alternatives but what do we do with those savings? We can provide access on a budget neutral basis to either more biosimilar or to totally new treatments that at this moment, some patients, perhaps many patients, would not be eligible to receive but where a payer could say, "okay, we achieve efficiencies here and let's now put that to some good use and make more of our members have the care that they should have, but that at this moment, our guidelines do not cover."
That brings us to really a global aspect of biosimilars and that is that biosimilars have the potential because of cost differentials to promote access and equity in health care to people who otherwise might not get it. Now, within the clinical environments, we need to remember, the decisions are not necessarily made at the point of care.
Can Global Policies to Boost Biosimilar Adoption Work in the US?
November 17th 2024On this special episode of Not So Different honoring Global Biosimilars Week, Craig Burton, executive director of the Biosimilars Council, explores how global policies—from incentives to health equity strategies—could boost biosimilar adoption in the US.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Q&A: Dr Kimberly Maxfield Explains How BsUFA III Will Advance the US Biosimilar Industry
December 20th 2023At AMCP Nexus, Kimberly Maxfield, PhD, pharmacologist at the FDA, delved into how the third reauthorization of the Biosimilar User Fee Act (BsUFA III) will shape the American biosimilar market and improve development efficiency over the next few years.
Breaking Barriers in Osteoporosis Care: New Denosumab Biosimilars Wyost, Jubbonti Approved
June 16th 2024In this episode, The Center for Biosimilars® delves into the FDA approval of the first denosumab biosimilars, Wyost and Jubbonti (denosumab-bbdz), and discuss their potential to revolutionize osteoporosis treatment with expert insights from 2 rheumatologists.