India-based drug manufacturer Cadila Healthcare has announced that it is planning to file a Biologics License Application (BLA) for its biosimilar pegfilgrastim with the FDA by the end of 2019. To date, no developer has been successful in gaining regulatory approval in the United States or European Union for a biosimilar of the reference pegfilgrastim.
India-based drug manufacturer Cadila Healthcare has announced that it is planning to file a Biologics License Application (BLA) for its biosimilar pegfilgrastim with the FDA by the end of 2019. To date, no developer has been successful in gaining regulatory approval in the United States or European Union for biosimilars of the reference pegfilgrastim.
Cadila’s proposed biosimilar references Amgen’s innovator product, Neulasta, which brought in about $4.5 billion in global sales last year. One of the challenges of developing a biosimilar pegfilgrastim is the presence of polyethylene glycol (PEG) molecule, which is bonded to filgrastim and slows the rate at which the drug is metabolized. Cadila’s proposed biosimilar is currently undergoing a phase 1 clinical trial where it is being tested in healthy volunteers for safety.
“We are discussing to do more [biosimilars for regulated markets],” said Sharvil Patel, managing director of Cadila Healthcare, as reported by Indian media. Meanwhile, Patel said, the company is planning to “aggressively push its biosimilars in semi-regulated emerging markets to boost revenues.” Cadila expects its biosimilar sales to have the potential to reach $500 million in the next 5 to 7 years, a large increase from the $45 million it currently produces.
Cadila is familiar with the development process of biosimilars, as it has already launched 8 such products in India. However, the FDA biosimilar regulatory pathway is among the most stringent in the world, and differs significantly from that in India.
Fellow Indian drug developer Biocon, together with partner Mylan, also filed a BLA for a biosimilar pegfilgrastim with the FDA, however, the application received a complete response letter (CRL) in October relating to “data from facility requalification activities” after recent adjustments to its manufacturing plant. Biocon said that the CRL did not raise question concerning the drug’s biosimilarity, pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic data, clinical data, or immunogenicity. Reportedly, the manufacturers are hopeful to re-file later this year.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Review Calls for Path to Global Harmonization of Biosimilar Development Regulations
March 17th 2025Global biosimilar regulatory harmonization will be needed to reduce development costs and improve patient access, despite challenges posed by differing national requirements and regulatory frameworks, according to review authors.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
From Amjevita to Zarxio: A Decade of US Biosimilar Approvals
March 6th 2025Since the FDA’s groundbreaking approval of Zarxio in 2015, the US biosimilars market has surged to 67 approvals across 18 originators—though the journey has been anything but smooth, with adoption facing hurdles along the way.