A phase 1 study testing Celltrion Healthcare’s omalizumab biosimilar in healthy subjects showed similar safety and pharmacokinetic profiles to the reference product (Xolair), as presented at the American Academy of Allergy Asthma and Immunology’s annual meeting.
Celltrion Healthcare’s omalizumab biosimilar (CT-P39) demonstrated comparable safety and pharmacokinetic profiles compared with the reference product (Xolair; Genentech/Novartis) in healthy volunteers, according to a poster presentation from the American Academy of Allergy Asthma and Immunology’s annual meeting.
The investigators conducted the study in 2 parts. The first part included the assessment of initial safety of the biosimilar and the second part included the comparison of its pharmacokinetics to the reference product. The biosimilar was compared against the version of Xolair approved in the European Union and the version licensed for use in the United States.
Omalizumab is an anti-inflammatory agent that binds to free immunoglobulin E (IgE), resulting in the reduction of free IgE and the increase of total IgE in a patient’s system stemming from the formation of omalizumab-IgE complexes. The reference product is used to treat asthma and chronic idiopathic urticaria, a form of hives. There are currently no biosimilars for Xolair that are FDA-approved or authorized for use under the European Medicines Agency.
In total, 176 healthy patients between the ages of 18 and 55 years with a total IgE level of equal to or less than 100 IU/mL at screening were enrolled in the study, and were randomly assigned to receive a single subcutaneous 150 mg dose of CT-P39, EU-Xolair, or US-Xolair. The subjects were followed up to 127 days after they received their injection and 18 total blood samples were planned to be taken from each person for pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetics analysis.
Overall, 62 subjects received the biosimilar, 64 received the European Union version of the reference product, and 50 were given the FDA-approved reference product. The mean age of the cohort was 27.8 years for the CT-P39 group, 30.9 years for the EU-Xolair group, and 30.3 years for the US-Xolair group. In all 3 groups, the majority of the subjects were women and White.
The pharmacodynamic profiles and serum concentrations of free IgE and total IgE were comparable between the groups. Although some numerical differences in pharmacodynamics were detected, the investigators said that they were likely driven by high inter-subject variation and deviating values. The mean serum concentrations of the biosimilar and reference drugs up to day 127 were also similar between the treatment groups.
The biosimilar group experienced a total of 87 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), with 19.4% of the cohort experiencing a headache and 14.5% experiencing an injection site reaction. The EU-Xolair group reported 115 TEAEs and the US-Xolair treatment arm reported 110 total TEAEs. Headaches and injection site reactions were experienced by 23.4% and 9.4% of the EU-Xolair subjects and 30.0% and 12.0% of the US-Xolair subjects, respectively.
Celltrion announced the launch of the phase 1 trial in 2019 and began testing CT-P39 in patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria in October 2020. The phase 3 trial was initiated after the Incheon, Republic of Korea-based company got the regulatory green light from the Republic of Korea’s Ministry of Food and Drug Safety to begin testing. The trial is being conducted across 65 sites in 7 countries and is expected to be completed half-way through 2023.
In addition to Celltrion, Selexis and Generium have an omalizumab biosimilar (Genolar), which was launched on the Russian market in February 2022 for the treatment of persistent atopic bronchial asthma and resistant chronic idiopathic urticaria for patients aged 6 years and older.
In April 2020, BiosanaPharma, a biotech company that operated in Australia, The Netherlands, and Singapore, also initiated a phase 1 study for its omalizumab biosimilar candidate (BP001). In February 2022, BiosanaPharma entered into a global licensing agreement with Alvotech Holdings for the omalizumab candidate.
Reference
Mclendon K, Wabnitz P, Kim S, et al. Pharmacodynamics of CT-P39, a proposed biosimilar of omalizumab, compared with EU-Xolair and US-Xolair; Result of a phase 1, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, single-dose study in healthy subjects. Presented at: AAAAI 2022; February 25-28, 2022; Phoenix, AZ. Abstract 586.
Boosting Health Care Sustainability: The Role of Biosimilars in Latin America
November 21st 2024Biosimilars could improve access to biologic treatments and health care sustainability in Latin America, but their adoption is hindered by misconceptions, regulatory gaps, and weak pharmacovigilance, requiring targeted education and stronger regulations.
Biosimilars Development Roundup for October 2024—Podcast Edition
November 3rd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the GRx+Biosims conference, which included discussions on data transparency, artificial intelligence (AI), and collaboration to enhance the global supply chain for biosimilars and generic drugs, as well as the evolving requirements for biosimilar devices.
Breaking Down Biosimilar Barriers: Interchangeability
November 14th 2024Part 3 of this series for Global Biosimilars Week, penned by Dracey Poore, director of biosimilars at Cardinal Health, explores the critical topic of interchangeability, examining its role in shaping biosimilar adoption and the broader implications for accessibility.
Exploring the Biosimilar Horizon: Julie Reed's Predictions for 2024
February 18th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, returns to discuss her predictions for the biosimilar industry for 2024 and beyond as well as the impact that the Forum's 4 new members will have on the organization's mission.
BioRationality: Should mRNA Copies Be Filed as NDAs or Biosimilars?
November 4th 2024The article by Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, argues that the FDA’s classification of future copies of messenger RNA (mRNA) products could be reconsidered, suggesting they might be eligible for new drug applications (NDAs) or a hybrid biosimilar category due to their unique characteristics and increasing prevalence.
Panelists Stress Stakeholder Education to Build Confidence in Biosimilars
October 31st 2024By expanding educational initiatives to clarify biosimilar safety, efficacy, and interchangeability, stakeholders can foster trust, improve access, and ensure that biosimilars are widely accepted as high-quality, cost-effective alternatives to originator biologics.