Novartis division Sandoz announced today that the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) of the European Medicines Agency has granted a positive opinion for the marketing authorization of biosimilar infliximab.
Novartis division Sandoz announced today that the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) of the European Medicines Agency has granted a positive opinion for the marketing authorization of its biosimilar infliximab.
The positive opinion is based on comprehensive data confirming the biosimilarity of infliximab to the reference product through analytical, preclinical, and clinical data that found the biosimilar matches the reference product in terms of quality, efficacy, and safety. CHMP has recommended the proposed biosimilar for the treatment of all indications of the reference product, including gastroenterology, rheumatology, and dermatology.
“Sandoz is proud to be at the forefront of diversifying the biologics treatment landscape by bringing biosimilar medicines to market for patients living with devastating autoimmune diseases. Today’s positive CHMP opinion marks a strong step forward in our efforts to accelerate patient access to biologics, and specifically infliximab, through our leading portfolio,” said Richard Francis, CEO of Sandoz, in a statement.
In the next step of the biosimilar approval process, the European Commission (EC) will review the CHMP’s positive opinion. The EC has the authority to approve or deny medicines for the European Union. If the EC approves the proposed biosimilar, it will grant a centralized marketing authorization that will be valid in the 28 EU member countries. Norway, Iceland, and Liechtenstein, members of the European Economic Area, will follow corresponding decisions based on the EC’s recommendation.
Sandoz currently has 5 other biosimilars on the European market, including somatropin (sold as Omnitrope), epoetin alfa (sold as Binocrit), filgrastim (sold as Zarzio in Europe), etanercept (sold as Erelzi), and rituximab (sold as Rixathon). In addition, it has another 3 biosimilars in its pipeline: LA-EP2006, a proposed pegfilgrastim biosimilar for the treatment of chemotherapy induced neutropenia; GP2013, a proposed rituximab biosimilar currently approved in the EU and pending an FDA decision for the treatment of certain blood cancers and inflammatory diseases; and GP2017, a proposed adalimumab biosimilar to potentially treat autoimmune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis.
Review Calls for Path to Global Harmonization of Biosimilar Development Regulations
March 17th 2025Global biosimilar regulatory harmonization will be needed to reduce development costs and improve patient access, despite challenges posed by differing national requirements and regulatory frameworks, according to review authors.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
From Amjevita to Zarxio: A Decade of US Biosimilar Approvals
March 6th 2025Since the FDA’s groundbreaking approval of Zarxio in 2015, the US biosimilars market has surged to 67 approvals across 18 originators—though the journey has been anything but smooth, with adoption facing hurdles along the way.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
Biosimilar Approvals Streamlined With Advanced Statistics Amidst Differing Regulatory Requirements
February 25th 2025The FDA and European Medicines Agency (EMA) mandate high similarity between biosimilars and reference products, but their regulatory processes differ, especially with multiple reference products.