This week, the Community Oncology Alliance (COA), which represents approximately 5000 community oncologists, announced that it has filed a lawsuit against HHS, HHS Secretary Alex Azar, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and the director of the OMB, Mick Mulvaney, in the District of Columbia to stop the departments from applying the Medicare sequester cut to reimbursement for Part B drugs.
This week, the Community Oncology Alliance (COA), which represents approximately 5000 community oncologists, announced that it has filed a lawsuit against HHS, HHS Secretary Alex Azar, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and the director of the OMB, Mick Mulvaney, in the District of Columbia to stop these agencies from applying the Medicare sequester cut to reimbursement for Part B drugs.
In 2011, the Federal government implanted the Budget Control Act because Congress was unable to reach a budget agreement. This automatic cut has been extended multiple times, with the current sequester scheduled to continue through 2027. As of 2013, CMS began applying a 2% budget sequester cut to all Medicare Part B reimbursement, including infused biologic drugs. COA’s lawsuit seeks injunctive relief to specifically stop CMS from applying the sequester to Part B drug reimbursement.
In the lawsuit, COA claims that the sequester cut has jeopardized “cancer patients, as well as their community oncology healthcare providers, because these patients are being forced to receive their treatment in more expensive hospital settings rather than in more affordable independent community oncology practices.” Additionally, the suit went on to state, “These wrongful acts also compromise access to cancer care for patients who cannot find or afford treatment when their local community oncology practice is forced to shut down or combine with or join a more expensive hospital.”
According to COA’s 2018 Community Oncology Practice Impact report, since the sequester began in 2013, approximately 135 independent community cancer clinics, many of whom have more than 1 location, have been forced to close.
COA also alleges that the application of the sequester cut to Part B drug reimbursement is both illegal and unconstitutional, due to Part B reimbursement being set by Congress in law at average sales price (ASP) plus 6% in the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003.
Said Ted Okon, MBA, executive director of COA, in an interview with The Center for Biosimilars®, “There’s just nothing that gives them the authority to apply [the sequester] on a reimbursement rate that’s set in law. Everything else is set by the physician, the hospital, the nursing home, all of the fee schedule...the one thing that isn’t is Medicare Part B reimbursement for physicians, which is set in law defined right in the Medicare Modernization Act.”
Concurrently with the suit, COA sent a letter addressed to HHS Secretary Azar explaining why the filing of this suit was a “last resort.” The letter also provided feedback on the President’s blueprint for lowering drug costs, offered suggestions to lower increasing cancer drug prices, and reiterated COA’s hope that it can work together with the Trump Administration.
“We’re going to fight on as we have done…we have a lot of education to do, a lot of fighting to do…it will be a shame if a court rules that, in essence, in this case that [HHS and OMB] were allowed to do this because then it could really create a constitutional precedent where the executive branch can basically run and do what it wants independent of Congress,” said Okon.
Boosting Health Care Sustainability: The Role of Biosimilars in Latin America
November 21st 2024Biosimilars could improve access to biologic treatments and health care sustainability in Latin America, but their adoption is hindered by misconceptions, regulatory gaps, and weak pharmacovigilance, requiring targeted education and stronger regulations.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Breaking Down Biosimilar Barriers: Interchangeability
November 14th 2024Part 3 of this series for Global Biosimilars Week, penned by Dracey Poore, director of biosimilars at Cardinal Health, explores the critical topic of interchangeability, examining its role in shaping biosimilar adoption and the broader implications for accessibility.
Breaking Down Biosimilar Barriers: Payer and PBM Policies
November 13th 2024Part 2 of this series for Global Biosimilars Week dives into the complexities of payer and pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) policies, how they impact biosimilar accessibility, and how addressing these issues may look under a second Trump term.