The Community Oncology Alliance (COA) recently formed a standing Biosimilars Committee for which The Center for Biosimilars® advisory board member, Kashyap Patel, MD, a practicing medical oncologist at Carolina Blood and Cancer Care in South Carolina, was named chair alongside co-chairs immediate past president of COA, Jeff Vacirca MD, FACP, and Michael Diaz, MD, incoming COA president.
The Community Oncology Alliance (COA) recently formed a standing Biosimilars Committee, for which The Center for Biosimilars® advisory board member, Kashyap Patel, MD, a practicing medical oncologist at Carolina Blood and Cancer Care in South Carolina, was named chair alongside co-chairs immediate past president of COA, Jeff Vacirca MD, FACP, and Michael Diaz, MD, incoming COA president.
“Recognizing the importance of biosimilars and the need for educating all oncology professionals, practices, and patients, the COA Board is also announcing the formation of a standing Biosimilars Committee,” read COA’s statement announcing the development.
According to COA, the committee will work to educate providers on the totality of the evidence supporting the use of biosimilars as well as provide information on interchangeability and discuss the state-level rules for pharmacy-level substitution. As part of this educational effort, COA will also develop guidelines aimed at helping pharmacists understand drug interchangeability.
Furthermore, the committee will look to assess the prevalence of biosimilars in the current market as an appropriate treatment option. By collecting these data, COA hopes to widen use of biosimilars and determine how these therapies may play a role in controlling costs for Part B drugs dispensed by community oncologists.
COA’s call for increased biosimilar education and guidance comes at a time at which the need for such efforts is becoming more clear; one recent systematic review found that providers in both Europe and the United States are still taking a cautious approach to prescribing biosimilars, in part because of a lack of awareness of these medicines.
The review relied on data from surveys in the United States and certain European countries, and found that, among other issues, US physicians showed concern and a lack of awareness about interchangeability and pharmacy-level substitution. One survey, conducted in 2016, found that 89.9% of clinicians disagreed with pharmacy-level substitution of a biosimilar. In another survey conducted in 2016, 80% of responding clinicians were unaware that an interchangeability designation could result in automatic substitution.
COA’s Biosimilars Committee will join other COA initiatives that seek to address oncology payment reform and healthcare policy. Notably, Dr. Patel was also elected vice president of COA.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
CHMP Pushes 3 Biosimilars Forward, Spelling Hope for Ophthalmology, Supportive Care Markets
February 6th 2025The European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) recommended 3 biosimilars and new indications for reference biologics, moving them closer to final European approval and expanding patient access.
The Biosimilar Void: 90% of Biologics Coming Off Patent Will Lack Biosimilars
February 5th 2025Of the 118 biologics losing exclusivity over the next decade, only 10% have biosimilars in development, meaning a vast majority of biologics have no pipeline, which limits savings potential for the health care system.