This week, Frost & Sullivan—a global researching and consulting organization—together with Rani Therapeutics, a drug manufacturer developing an approach to the oral delivery of large-molecule drugs, announced the results of a combined research study. The study suggested that biosimilar developers could gain market share from brand-name biologics by developing the biosimilars in oral form.
This week, Frost & Sullivan—a global researching and consulting organization—together with Rani Therapeutics, a drug manufacturer developing an approach to the oral delivery of large-molecule drugs, announced the results of a combined research study. The study suggested that biosimilar developers could gain market share from brand-name biologics by developing the biosimilars in oral form.
The research included a survey of more than 500 patients, and more than 100 physicians, including rheumatologists and gastroenterologists. The survey found that 88% of patients and 86% of rheumatologists and gastroenterologists would likely switch from adalimumab (Humira) injections to once-daily pills if an effective oral alternative existed.
Additionally, the results of the study found that such an oral drug could increase patient compliance with treatment. This factor is especially notable in light of the survey’s finding that 62% of patients and 86% of physicians reported that patients either skip or consistently fail to inject the drug as prescribed.
“Humira is the number 1 selling drug in the world, yet this research shows that its sales and AbbVie’s revenues could potentially be threatened by oral adalimumab because of fear of needles and the associated lack of patient compliance. Combine those challenges with patent expiration and the increasing threat of biosimilars, which are forecast to hit the market in the coming years, and it’s the perfect storm,” said Mir Imran, chairman and CEO of Rani Therapeutics, in a statement.
However, the companies did not address the key question of whether regulatory bodies like the FDA or the European Medicines Agency would approve such an orally administered drug as a biosimilar of an injectable or infusible reference product, as such a drug would not be similar in its route of administration, and challenges with interchangeability (and therefore pharmacy-level substitution for the reference product) would be likely.
Rani Therapeutics is not the first drug maker to see the value in an orally delivered biologic, however. Just last month, Protalix BioTherapeutics, Inc, an Israel-based drug manufacturer, announced positive results from a phase 2 clinical trial for its own novel, orally administered anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) drug, OPRX-106, for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.
President Trump Signs Executive Order to Bring Down Drug Prices
April 16th 2025To help bring down sky-high drug prices, President Donald Trump signed an executive order pushing for faster biosimilar development, more transparency, and tougher rules on pharmacy benefit managers—aiming to save billions and make meds more affordable for everyone.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Risk-Adjusted NPV Framework for Biosimilars Shows Key Investment Drivers
April 7th 2025Early market entry, manufacturing efficiency, and market share are critical to biosimilar development success, while technical complexity and competition heavily impact returns, according to a study presenting a risk-adjusted net present value (NPV) analysis framework.