Anti–tumor necrosis factor drugs are expensive, and there are a limited number of choices for IBD treatment, highlighting the need to use every existing agent optimally.
Anti—tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents, including infliximab and adalimumab, have revolutionized the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, primary nonresponse (defined as no initial clinical benefit to therapy) and secondary loss of response (defined as a loss of response after an initially favorable outcome) are common, with resulting adverse outcomes. Among infliximab- and adalimumab-treated patients with IBD, primary nonresponse occurs in 10% to 30% of patients, while secondary loss of response occurs in 23% to 46% of patients by 12 months. Anti-TNF drugs are expensive, and there are a limited number of choices for IBD treatment, highlighting the need to use every existing agent optimally. Recently, anti-TNF dosing guided by therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has emerged as a potential strategy to optimize treatment and maximize benefit from these drugs, but there has been no formal consensus about TDM-guided anti-TNF dosing.
Recently, a group of 25 IBD experts from the Australian Inflammatory Bowel Disease Consensus Working Group and other international experts published recommendations on TDM in anti-TNF therapy that supported the role of TDM in optimizing treatment with anti-TNF agents for patients with IBD, particularly in situations of treatment failure.
The committee recommends TDM of anti-TNF agents upon treatment failure, following successful treatment induction, and when contemplating a drug holiday. However, the group said there is inconsistent evidence for proactive TDM, and therefore advise that TDM should be performed for patients in stable remission only if results are likely to impact clinical management. The assembly’s statement was published on October 13, 2017, in Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics.
The statement presents an appropriate therapeutic range for infliximab and adalimumab that was delineated to make the guidelines more clinically applicable. The statement also makes the following recommendations:
In order to reach their conclusions, the experts examined scenarios concerning when TDM of anti-TNF agents should be performed, the general approach to patients with symptoms of active disease while receiving anti-TNF therapy, the interpretation of TDM results in patients with confirmed active inflammatory disease who are on anti-TNF therapy, interpreting TDM results among patients in clinical remission who are on anti-TNF therapy, target drug trough levels, anti-drug antibodies, and TDM for other types of biological agents as well as future therapies.
The final recommendations were reached through a consensus process using a modified Delphi technique that used 3 iterations. The panelists agreed on the level of evidence and grade of recommendation according to Australian National Health and Medical Research Council guidelines, and all members of the delegation approved the final draft recommendations prior to submission for publication.
“In conclusion, TDM of anti-TNF agents is an important component of personalized therapy in IBD,” the experts state. “These consensus statements should provide a practical guide to applying TDM of anti-TNF agents in treatment optimization for IBD patients.”
Boosting Health Care Sustainability: The Role of Biosimilars in Latin America
November 21st 2024Biosimilars could improve access to biologic treatments and health care sustainability in Latin America, but their adoption is hindered by misconceptions, regulatory gaps, and weak pharmacovigilance, requiring targeted education and stronger regulations.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Breaking Down Biosimilar Barriers: Payer and PBM Policies
November 13th 2024Part 2 of this series for Global Biosimilars Week dives into the complexities of payer and pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) policies, how they impact biosimilar accessibility, and how addressing these issues may look under a second Trump term.
Biosimilars Gastroenterology Roundup for May 2024—Podcast Edition
June 2nd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review the biggest gastroenterology biosimilar stories from May 2024, covering new data from conferences and journals on infliximab and adalimumab products that demonstrate positive clinical results and confirm the safety of these biosimilars, as well as the feasibility of switching to them.
Skyrizi Overtakes Humira: “Product Hopping” Leaves Biosimilar Market in Limbo
November 7th 2024For the first time, Skyrizi (risankizumab-rzaa) has replaced Humira (reference adalimumab) as AbbVie’s sales driver, largely due to companies encouraging “product hopping” to avoid competition, creating concerns for the sustainability of the burgeoning adalimumab biosimilar market.